IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mipshop] Re: [16NG] My comment about draft-ietf-mipshop-fh80216e-01 during the 16ng meeting

Rajeev Koodli <rajeev.koodli@nokia.com> Tue, 24 July 2007 15:15 UTC

Return-path: <16ng-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IDM6J-0006gv-G4; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:15:03 -0400
Received: from 16ng by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IDM6H-0006Yr-P1 for 16ng-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:15:01 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IDM6D-0006Lr-Ic; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:14:57 -0400
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.170] helo=mgw-ext11.nokia.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IDM6B-000179-Uy; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:14:57 -0400
Received: from esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh108.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.145]) by mgw-ext11.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id l6OFEoQj021578; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:14:51 +0300
Received: from daebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.241.35.112]) by esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:14:17 +0300
Received: from daebe103.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.241.35.24]) by daebh102.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:14:06 -0500
Received: from 10.241.58.156 ([10.241.58.156]) by daebe103.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.241.35.24]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:14:06 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.4.060510
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 08:14:17 -0700
Subject: Re: [Mipshop] Re: [16NG] My comment about draft-ietf-mipshop-fh80216e-01 during the 16ng meeting
From: Rajeev Koodli <rajeev.koodli@nokia.com>
To: <heejin.jang@samsung.com>, "Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)" <jonne.soininen@nsn.com>
Message-ID: <C2CB6559.14729%rajeev.koodli@nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: [Mipshop] Re: [16NG] My comment about draft-ietf-mipshop-fh80216e-01 during the 16ng meeting
Thread-Index: AcfOBU1Gi41BnDn4EdydSgAWy5YJpw==
In-Reply-To: <4650106.44501185250906867.JavaMail.weblogic@ep_ml19>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jul 2007 15:14:06.0810 (UTC) FILETIME=[47340BA0:01C7CE05]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 41c17b4b16d1eedaa8395c26e9a251c4
Cc: mipshop@ietf.org, "16ng@ietf.org" <16ng@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Heejin,

Another option is to include this text in the Appendix. 16e and Wimax are
related, and at least some may find it informative.

Regards,

-Rajeev



On 7/23/07 9:21 PM, "ext Heejin Jang" <heejin.jang@samsung.com> wrote:

> Hi, Jonne & folks.
> 
> Since the draft has been adopted as an informational document,  we have
> thought that 
> giving an example with the WiMAX model will not be a problem.
> However, it seems that some folks are already confused about why the specific
> WiMAX model 
> should be mentioned in the draft and whether  WiMAX has decided to use the
> FMIPv6 & 802.21 or not .
>  
> Because the WiMAX-related text in the draft can be misleading, it will be
> deleted 
> if there is no strong objection from  the MIPSHOP tomorrow.
>  
> Thanks for your opinion. :)
>  
> - Best regards, 
> Heejin.
>  
> 
> ------- Original Message -------
> Sender : Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)<jonne.soininen@nsn.com>
> jonne.soininen@nsn.com
> Date   : 2007-07-24 09:20
> Title  : [16NG] My comment about draft-ietf-mipshop-fh80216e-01 during the
> 16ng meeting
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I was asked to write my comment I made during the 16ng meeting to the
> mailing list. So, here it comes.
> 
> I commented during the meeting that I was a bit worried about the Wimax
> related references in the -01 to the Wimax and the usage of FMIP in it. I
> said that I was worried about talking about how Wimax should, could, or
> possibly would use FMIP in the Wimax architecture in an IETF document as
> Wimax is a specific architecture defined by the Wimax Forum. Thus, IETF
> should not tell how they should use fmip without a very good reason, but it
> should be left for the Wimax Forum to do.
> 
> I haven&#39;t have time to look at the version -02, yet. I don&#39;t know if
> the
> confusion persists there.
> 
> I hope this helps.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jonne.

-- 
http://people.nokia.net/~rajeev





_______________________________________________
16NG mailing list
16NG@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email