Re: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS
"Qiang Zhang" <qiangieee@gmail.com> Wed, 17 January 2007 21:18 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1H7IBN-0007Jy-PR; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:18:57 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7IBM-0007JO-BH
for 16ng@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:18:56 -0500
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.242])
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7IBK-0007qZ-2y
for 16ng@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:18:56 -0500
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d30so3637and
for <16ng@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:18:51 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=g6jImn7bRR9EkQhdq7E7aNmm6p5gfjTDlkHhfhh5V6/xu8RLkqdKv89cilkqyCHG7Fi5xSOqIh2J0+N30Vn7TCIzcV3z25TFuo7fFhkozrEgrB7SowUVdIWng/GHGo5k3VhmO7b9PLAxsDYAxr0w7ldKB7CUCMGMI8bX4nhVI+4=
Received: by 10.100.152.9 with SMTP id z9mr4316and.1169068731785;
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:18:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.70.102.13 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:18:51 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4a8dceef0701171318g3174dfbo93e37a931a4819e2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:18:51 -0500
From: "Qiang Zhang" <qiangieee@gmail.com>
To: "Basavaraj Patil" <basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS
In-Reply-To: <C1D3BCF4.2C8C0%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <45AE5CE2.8060500@motorola.com>
<C1D3BCF4.2C8C0%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 944ecb6e61f753561f559a497458fb4f
Cc: 16ng@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: qiangieee@gmail.com
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>,
<mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>,
<mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0487613352=="
Errors-To: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org
Is there a real case that PPP/PPPoE is overlaid on top PDP or PPP (PDSN case) or LAP? My guess is that No, i haven't seen a DIALer that does this and there is no reason to do so. There is case that PC PPP to the AT though but this terminates at the AT On 1/17/07, Basavaraj Patil <basavaraj.patil@nokia.com> wrote: > > > Alex, > > > On 1/17/07 11:29 AM, "ext Alexandru Petrescu" > <alexandru.petrescu@motorola.com> wrote: > > > Basavaraj Patil wrote: > >> Alex, > >> > >> Again a comment on just one of your statements: > >> > >> > >> On 1/17/07 11:04 AM, "ext Alexandru Petrescu" > >> <alexandru.petrescu@motorola.com> wrote: > >> > >>> And I'm asking this because ppp is used everywhere on GPRS/UMTS, > >>> and pppoe is used on some HSDPA. > >> > >> PPP is NOT used in GPRS/UMTS or HSDPA. > > > > How do you know? I know because I've tried. It's always the pppd > > program and ConfigReq sent/received. > > The PPP that you are talking about is most likely not between your PC card > (that is implementing GPRS/HSDPA) and the GGSN. You could be doing PPP > over > a PDP context that is established between the PC card and the GGSN. > Question > is, does the PPP terminate at the GGSN? Of course not knowing what kind of > service you are using or details, I can only speculate. > > > > > Do you mean a SDO spec says that PDP context is set up? And that that > > SDO document doesn't say 'ppp is used'? I agree with this part. > > PPP is an overhead and not required to transport IP packets in GPRS. PDP > contexts are the mechanism used for carrying IP packets. > > > > >> PPPoE is NOT used in GPRS/UMTS or HSDPA. > > > > What do you call a PPP ConfigReq within a MAC header with 48bits > > addresses, as displayed by Ethereal? And with a pcmcia card saying > hsdpa. > > Your Ethereal may not really be have the drivers to read what is being > sent > by the HSDPA card... I don't know. As I said above, tell me where is PPP > being terminated in the network, i.e the GPRS core? > > > > >> PDP context != PPP or PPPoE > > > > I'm sorry. PDP context is not something defined at IETF, a different > > beast, can't compare. > > And I am not asking you to do so. I was just correcting a statement about > PPP usage that you made. And it appeared to be a globally applicable > statement to all GPRS/UMTS/HSDPA deployments. > > -Raj > > > > > Alex > > > > > _______________________________________________ > 16NG mailing list > 16NG@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng >
_______________________________________________ 16NG mailing list 16NG@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng
- Re: [16NG] FW: Review on v6ops 802.16 deployment … gabriel montenegro
- Re: [16NG] FW: Review on v6ops 802.16 deployment … Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS (was: [16NG] FW… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS (was: [16NG] FW… Jihoon Lee
- [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Pars Mutaf
- Re: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Ray Bell
- Re: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Steve Jackowski
- [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Jihoon Lee
- Re: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Qiang Zhang
- Re: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Jihoon Lee
- [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Alexandru Petrescu
- [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Jihoon Lee
- [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Daniel Park
- Re: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Daniel Park
- RE: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS David Johnston
- Re: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS David Johnston
- RE: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Riegel, Maximilian
- Re: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Alexandru Petrescu
- [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Jihoon Lee
- [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Riegel, Maximilian
- Re: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Riegel, Maximilian
- Re: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Basavaraj Patil
- Re: more on ppp clarification ... [16NG] Re: mult… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Basavaraj Patil
- Re: ppp - I'll stop discussing (was: [16NG] Re: m… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS Qiang Zhang
- [16NG] Re: stepped multicast operation (was: and … Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: [16NG] Re: stepped multicast operation (was: … Riegel, Maximilian
- Re: [16NG] Re: stepped multicast operation (was: … Jihoon Lee
- [16NG] Re: stepped multicast operation (was: and … Jihoon Lee
- [16NG] Re: stepped multicast operation Alexandru Petrescu
- [16NG] Re: stepped multicast operation Jihoon Lee
- [16NG] Re: stepped multicast operation and two qu… Alexandru Petrescu
- [16NG] Re: stepped multicast operation and two qu… Jihoon Lee
- [16NG] RE: stepped multicast operation and two qu… David Johnston
- [16NG] Re: stepped multicast operation and two qu… Alexandru Petrescu