IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval

"Junghoon Jee" <junghoon.jee@gmail.com> Fri, 23 November 2007 12:09 UTC

Return-path: <16ng-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IvXLF-0002ph-Cp; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 07:09:05 -0500
Received: from 16ng by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IvXLD-0002pb-BO for 16ng-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 07:09:03 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IvXLD-0002pO-1e for 16ng@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 07:09:03 -0500
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IvXL9-00064M-29 for 16ng@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 07:09:02 -0500
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d21so2514927nfb for <16ng@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 04:08:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=bFql1PiYEgH+ZTb8HGs/0vF3090AlD/k1gvK9Y6N9/Q=; b=gg6+gprQh1nqURXCqOlRnNUvfKAlKnSAzwvA3Bbkn6oBbw4X8ooGi3iXRwLx8iuuwdFFboOVh2XivUsBvelJNfZG4H+fpiJwIz7AyIvAnbrhYMCG+McrPn0OIZX0io0Jrxf9SUEDKEOhpw7RZrdE9wERimsR2IRXyA3fnG2/mC8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=fqZ+DuQkrVxvNy/MaAZN3S7IqClBd4gV5p8W2tPI0+W0uqKUfRXBycuN/19YFQJSYIl3zI2Hy7zCvqV6qdKKSLYafBBuYXPag8RMI9T+yxHQZ4YBMO/3BNyBBlDs6KrWavDBccDxCf4/8SQmPa56TPYFiWxYxzHR85HEqMFIFIQ=
Received: by 10.86.100.7 with SMTP id x7mr9513011fgb.1195819738328; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 04:08:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.86.68.9 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 04:08:58 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <d47344770711230408i206b0204u3ae3e73363940b0b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:08:58 +0900
From: "Junghoon Jee" <junghoon.jee@gmail.com>
To: "Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Subject: Re: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval
In-Reply-To: <4746AECE.4080402@piuha.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <d47344770711220101y3597825fnaeb77e155ce12a06@mail.gmail.com> <C36BC142.4C82B%basavaraj.patil@nsn.com> <d47344770711230155k2676cc6bsa07f7e7bb2159918@mail.gmail.com> <4746AECE.4080402@piuha.net>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9ed51c9d1356100bce94f1ae4ec616a9
Cc: 16ng@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2071343240=="
Errors-To: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org

To maintain the IP reachability through neighbor discovery packets, yes, I
need to send them.
However, those packets can wake up idle/sleep SS.
What can we recommend in this situation?

Junghoon


2007/11/23, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>et>:
>
>
> >
> > >Because of the PtP link type there is no question about an MS being
> > transitioned out of Idle mode because of ND.
> >
> > So, we should not send neighbor discovery packets in case of the IPv6CS?
>
> No, you send them when you need to.
>
> Jari
>
>

_______________________________________________
16NG mailing list
16NG@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email