Re: [16NG] WGLC: draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethernet-over-802.16-02

"Jongtaek Oh" <jtoh@hansung.ac.kr> Thu, 06 September 2007 04:05 UTC

Return-path: <16ng-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IT8cS-0004Jl-Bd; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:05:28 -0400
Received: from 16ng by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IT8cP-0004JI-VL for 16ng-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:05:26 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IT8cP-0004J9-Jy for 16ng@ietf.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:05:25 -0400
Received: from [128.134.165.9] (helo=hansung.ac.kr) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IT8cN-0001Mx-Gg for 16ng@ietf.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:05:25 -0400
x-beehive-trace: jtoh@hansung.ac.kr 16ng@ietf.org 211.48.44.13
Received: from hansung.ac.kr by ietf.org with ESMTP (hansung.ac.kr) for 16ng@ietf.org; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 13:06:21 +0900 (KST)
x-beehive-kind: normal
x-beehive-modified: received kind
Message-ID: <002501c7f03b$24268770$0d2c30d3@jtohoffice>
From: "Jongtaek Oh" <jtoh@hansung.ac.kr>
To: <16ng@ietf.org>, "Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com>
References: <0JNV004TFJKQF3@mmp2.samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [16NG] WGLC: draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethernet-over-802.16-02
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 13:05:17 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 5a9a1bd6c2d06a21d748b7d0070ddcb8
Cc: =?utf-8?B?7LCo7Jqp7KO867CV7IKs?= <yjtcha@kt.co.kr>, =?utf-8?B?7J207ZiE7Jqw7IiY7ISd?= <woojaa@samsung.com>, =?utf-8?B?6rmA7ZiV6rec6rO87J6l64uY?= <hyungkim@kt.co.kr>, =?utf-8?B?7J6E64K07ZiE7LGF7J6E?= <nh_lim@samsung.com>
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0199511902=="
Errors-To: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org

I have some comment about the draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethernet-over-802.16-02,
especially for broadcasting and multicasting issue.

1. Firstly, it describes the functionality of IEEE 802.16 network for MBS services, very pessimistically.
    As it mentioned, the specification and technology for MBS is not perfect. But it is under developing by NWG of WiMax forum,
    and the broadcasting and/or multicasting in the radio link could be possible, not impossible.
    This draft is for standard RFC, not for informative RFC, so only specification related matters must be defined in the draft
    and leave the room for new technology can come in.

2. MBS service is important for network operators and service providers to compete with the other cellular networks.
    For example, 3GPP Release99 can broadcast messages using cell broadcasting technology.
    WiMax forum is developing MCBCS related technologies and specifications which deals with the solution against the problems the appendix A cited.
    For example, the unicasting or the broadcasting methods are to be decided at the BS or AR according to the number of users in the cell.
    If all the IETF documents exclude the possibility of broadcasting and multicasting transmission method, then they could be useless to the WiMax industry.

In conclusion, I suggest to remove all the sentences which state the negative respects of  multicast/broadcast for 802.16 network including Appendix A.


Jongtaek Oh
Hansung Univ.
Seoul, Korea




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com>
To: <16ng@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 11:43 AM
Subject: RE: [16NG] WGLC: draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethernet-over-802.16-02


> reminding...
> 
> No show in the list for this WGLC. If you have any comments/feedbacks on
> this call, please speak up now. Also, if you are ok with this version (no
> changes), please show up your positive on this list. Otherwise, this WGLC
> can't pass...!
> 
> Daniel Park
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daniel Park [mailto:soohong.park@samsung.com] 
>> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 3:50 PM
>> To: 16ng@ietf.org
>> Subject: [16NG] WGLC: draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethernet-over-802.16-02
>> 
>> Folks,
>> 
>> This is a WGLC on draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethernet-over-802.16-02
>> "Transmission of IP over Ethernet over IEEE 802.16 Networks".
>> 
>> o Intended publication: Proposed Standard RFC
>> 
>> The latest version can be found at:
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-et
>> hernet-over-80
>> 2.16-02.txt
>> 
>> Due to vacation period, it will expire on September 7 2007.
>> 
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> Daniel Park & Gabriel Montenegro
>> Chairs, 16NG Working Group
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 16NG mailing list
>> 16NG@ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 16NG mailing list
> 16NG@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng
>
_______________________________________________
16NG mailing list
16NG@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng