Re: [16NG] I-D Action:draft-ietf-16ng-ipv4-over-802-dot-16-ipcs-07.txt

<Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> Thu, 03 June 2010 20:44 UTC

Return-Path: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: 16ng@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 16ng@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2D03A68DB for <16ng@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 13:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mJwjBwbZOb1O for <16ng@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 13:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-mx06.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4260D3A6895 for <16ng@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 13:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh106.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.32]) by mgw-mx06.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o53KhvAB023238 for <16ng@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:43:57 +0300
Received: from vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.30]) by vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:43:52 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.8]) by vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:43:47 +0300
Received: from NOK-EUMSG-03.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.108]) by nok-am1mhub-04.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.8]) with mapi; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 22:43:47 +0200
From: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
To: maximilian.riegel@nsn.com, 16ng@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 22:43:44 +0200
Thread-Topic: [16NG] I-D Action:draft-ietf-16ng-ipv4-over-802-dot-16-ipcs-07.txt
Thread-Index: AcsCyP3ZBHNAbCjOQayyAgLl5L5ETwAk2FIgAABFdyE=
Message-ID: <C82D7E30.954D%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <BC27158B99D3064A955ADE084783900C03817880@DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jun 2010 20:43:47.0969 (UTC) FILETIME=[775E1F10:01CB035D]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Subject: Re: [16NG] I-D Action:draft-ietf-16ng-ipv4-over-802-dot-16-ipcs-07.txt
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:44:16 -0000

Max,

Is the new IP-CS based on GPCS? If so, I believe it is better to write a
separate I-D which specifies v4 and v6 transport over such a convergence
sublayer.

-Raj 


On 6/3/10 3:40 PM, "Riegel, Maximilian" <maximilian.riegel@nsn.com> wrote:

> Is it really reasonable to progress this I-D towards RFC? Meanwhile
> IEEE802.16 as well as WiMAX Forum are moving towards an combined IP-CS,
> which is capable to transfer IPv4 packets as well as IPv6 packets over
> the same service flows.
> 
> IMHO, it would make much more sense to merge the IPv6-CS and the IPv4-CS
> specification text into a common IP-CS text.
> 
> Bye
> Max
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:16ng-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> ext Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 5:00 AM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: 16ng@ietf.org
> Subject: [16NG] I-D
> Action:draft-ietf-16ng-ipv4-over-802-dot-16-ipcs-07.txt
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the IP over IEEE 802.16 Networks Working
> Group of the IETF.
> 
> 
>         Title           : Transmission of IPv4 packets over IEEE
> 802.16's IP Convergence Sublayer
>         Author(s)       : S. Madanapalli, et al.
>         Filename        :
> draft-ietf-16ng-ipv4-over-802-dot-16-ipcs-07.txt
>         Pages           : 13
>         Date            : 2010-06-02
> 
> IEEE 802.16 is an air interface specification for wireless broadband
> access.  IEEE 802.16 has specified multiple service specific
> Convergence Sublayers for transmitting upper layer protocols.  The
> packet CS (Packet Convergence Sublayer) is used for the transport of
> all packet-based protocols such as Internet Protocol (IP) and IEEE
> 802.3 (Ethernet).  The IP-specific part of the Packet CS enables the
> transport of IPv4 packets directly over the IEEE 802.16 Media Access
> Control (MAC).
> 
> This document specifies the frame format, the Maximum Transmission
> Unit (MTU) and address assignment procedures for transmitting IPv4
> packets over the IP-specific part of the Packet Convergence Sublayer
> of IEEE 802.16.
> 
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-16ng-ipv4-over-802-dot-16
> -ipcs-07.txt
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
> Internet-Draft.
> _______________________________________________
> 16NG mailing list
> 16NG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng