IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [16NG] [nwg-chair] NWG feedback on 16ng's IPv4 CS draft

gabriel montenegro <g_e_montenegro@yahoo.com> Wed, 10 June 2009 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <g_e_montenegro@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: 16ng@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 16ng@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6BB3A6B61 for <16ng@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:31:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.374
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.374 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.225, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VjKtCNHsSVVS for <16ng@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web82603.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web82603.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.201.120]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 38D473A6A24 for <16ng@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 94461 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Jun 2009 17:31:56 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1244655116; bh=Syj2MQ+Htmfw2azzzeMvco84Kzsx5znp+e/ShiAS+K8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=xv8Y6FabMOamOeWYUlYMket1AoY0FSgAax8bEjS93ZOmtqjyL49f2Wa66neZFbOz80YLHdZAAC8Q8YZgaYROpFaXSYpRk/GjTKhOfwW1xQyqCDfYjG2VVhzuCCcp8p4Hd+usswDbQ+iuVJAAPWWIJ2F2+DBPDK1oWPv6Ba5F+GE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=eMqNAX26cL8+mYwIzk65tRFzE8Mb8fh0tiz7hVlSICq41EHxG68Jfthm0vdpZs1nsRMoTYkZjGbySXWkvjD6HR2rTr+femuKR7Xuu2HjBK0BcI312Fq/mm8Wm/yIY3O7W/g8HapCy57MBTB0F9NIiDskmzNqge8A+yJTjFj4bBk=;
Message-ID: <284280.89779.qm@web82603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: mQoj.E0VM1nXZksIwzKZT.JmuP3uGd_D.zewwnKAAyzDQmIRmsd_HAq60hBCHU_0L3hFYPrag6DW4UFUI9C8s1rcmJDFclR8kkj1kl94esnFuTakJUAZ2KDdSApP9ggfQ.g9axrAYaCLOv9vDfEtAr2CfmuaK0qeAx5ArMDoAmZdwxsLo8DCtF.EzILkaWGKsuRpsu9yAXOYeU.ZTYCXU5C2lGhFFmf7F3DrUA7LBJyOVTNj8jALrYOM25rtqZ4FGE.Ghm6dD_hGQYLjcCMUDDITeRrPGI8iRIVLxJOjFTs0l_MBShVxwxcxkGtJN5BI4hfnp1c_tIuEzOmPyKI-
Received: from [24.16.92.42] by web82603.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:31:56 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1277.43 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.10
References: <2828BDE8DC61004E8104C78E82A0B39710B25385F2@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com><BC27158B99D3064A955ADE084783900C01B5CBC8@DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0905151247200.12703@tin>, <046201c9d589$267cf8d0$7376ea70$@com> <BAA9BC6C-6B59-4BA6-B63D-E09C26E0194B@mimectl> <BC27158B99D3064A955ADE084783900C020F18E5@DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net> <056601c9d7e8$b8be17e0$2a3a47a0$@com> <556994.50253.qm@web82604.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <06ab01c9d8cd$079cc660$16d65320$@com> <BC27158B99D3064A955ADE084783900C020F26B5@DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net> <916575.77425.qm@web82607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <570230.22436.qm@web82606.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0906040915000.16060@tin> <553392.88380.qm@web82604.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <alpine.LRH.2.00.0906101344500.19541@netcore.fi> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0906101255320.9230@tin>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:31:56 -0700
From: gabriel montenegro <g_e_montenegro@yahoo.com>
To: Wesley George <wgeorge@sprint.net>, Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0906101255320.9230@tin>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: ext Alper Yegin <alper.yegin@yegin.org>, 16ng@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [16NG] [nwg-chair] NWG feedback on 16ng's IPv4 CS draft
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:31:56 -0000

I'll add a reference to the RFC with language to the effect that it is just one possible source of information.



----- Original Message ----
> From: Wesley George <wgeorge@sprint.net>
> To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
> Cc: gabriel montenegro <g_e_montenegro@yahoo.com>; "Riegel, Maximilian (NSN - DE/Munich)" <maximilian.riegel@nsn.com>; ext Samita Chakrabarti <samitac@ipinfusion.com>; ext Alper Yegin <alper.yegin@yegin.org>; 16ng@ietf.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 9:57:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [16NG] [nwg-chair] NWG feedback on 16ng's IPv4 CS draft
> 
> I can appreciate that approach. I didn't really consider that we might be 
> reinventing the wheel. *blush*
> I think a reference to some issues that the implementor should be aware of is 
> better than no mention of them so probably since the below is still in draft, 
> the RFC is better than nothing.
> 
> Thanks,
> Wes
> 
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Pekka Savola wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, gabriel montenegro wrote:
> >> For example, one could think of referring interested readers to:
> >>  
> >> MTU and Fragmentation Issues with In-the-Network Tunneling
> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4459 
> >> But I don't even know if that is the more appropriate text one would want to 
> point at.
> >> I'm cc-ing the author, Pekka Savola, as he may have some more current info 
> for us.
> > 
> > In developing a protocol, I personally think the protocol specification should 
> decide a model to be adopted either in the protocol or in operating the 
> protocol, or just explicitly leave the issue open. RFC4459 just lists some 
> alternatives and their tradeoffs.
> > 
> > Apart from that there isn't much to add.  There's a bit more recent 00 draft 
> that also discusses tunnels from an architectural and less practical 
> perspective, but I'm not sure if it provides any more information than the RFC 
> above: draft-touch-intarea-tunnels-00.
> > 
> > 
> > -- Pekka Savola                "You each name yourselves king, yet the
> > Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
> > Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email