Re: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS

Basavaraj Patil <basavaraj.patil@nokia.com> Wed, 17 January 2007 17:09 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7EIH-0008BX-0B; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:09:49 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7EIF-0008BG-Dh for 16ng@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:09:47 -0500
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.172] helo=mgw-ext13.nokia.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7EID-00019W-UX for 16ng@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:09:47 -0500
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-ext13.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id l0HH7uig020715; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:08:05 +0200
Received: from daebh101.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.241.35.111]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:09:38 +0200
Received: from daebe101.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.241.35.113]) by daebh101.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:09:33 -0600
Received: from 10.162.253.240 ([10.162.253.240]) by daebe101.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.241.35.113]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:09:33 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.2.061213
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:11:20 -0600
Subject: Re: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS
From: Basavaraj Patil <basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
To: ext Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@motorola.com>, "Riegel, Maximilian" <maximilian.riegel@siemens.com>
Message-ID: <C1D3B4D8.2C8B6%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: [16NG] Re: multicast and IPv6 over ETHCS
Thread-Index: Acc6WoGmwBqp8KZNEduNAwARJNUNiA==
In-Reply-To: <45AE570D.5010803@motorola.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jan 2007 17:09:33.0961 (UTC) FILETIME=[42726790:01C73A5A]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Cc: 16ng@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org

Alex,

Again a comment on just one of your statements:


On 1/17/07 11:04 AM, "ext Alexandru Petrescu"
<alexandru.petrescu@motorola.com> wrote:

> And I'm asking this
> because ppp is used everywhere on GPRS/UMTS, and pppoe is used on some
> HSDPA.

PPP or PPPoE is NOT used in GPRS/UMTS or HSDPA.
PDP context != PPP or PPPoE

-Raj

> Alex
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 16NG mailing list
> 16NG@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng


_______________________________________________
16NG mailing list
16NG@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng