IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [16NG] Node Req: Issue 6: Support for RFC 5121: IP version 6 over WiMAX

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 03 December 2008 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <16ng-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 16ng-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-16ng-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF0F28C0F4; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 12:55:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 16ng@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 16ng@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA9293A6820 for <16ng@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 12:55:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.485
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.485 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.114, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0fUeqrBNziM0 for <16ng@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 12:55:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.237]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF3E3A6A10 for <16ng@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 12:55:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so3531753rvf.49 for <16ng@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:55:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=M5qpE1hkgBqGQZyldq6kEGvqqvEPRwIbsKEKuaObzUw=; b=B2HZkhbm1IZTnfBu5mYmawXlGW1ciPWOmjam85ETxdqQicahFjgO9XY6FzNh3TXJvX QTgirfBjUHmW9XOd0FY7H/kuqx9K/kR4EA4+gHORxc/QsPDwa1ANv9JMTB+YAzcDcnIc pmh+HsxMYfHcKPBsmAftR9F2X2T2fC62+lXFA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Qvnq4H4crE/nIiokCASnmIW4yuz1nwKOiiy3yVE1bW7JQ0v8CAab746GJ2tyWsB/QB j7ZiSNEFSoOAD2Yf2qH6hhfpNvnKqtnFH0BnKJq3HkMWw4nCM8g5ZLXdECRfroGoQ6CO KAGtmkccK0lxoG08ch0KMN5g4qryQQTpmuB1s=
Received: by 10.140.193.16 with SMTP id q16mr6508335rvf.94.1228337712449; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:55:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?130.216.38.124? (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b8sm13537823rvf.3.2008.12.03.12.55.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:55:11 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4936F229.1000400@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 09:55:05 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
References: <4BACF58443A3A04688976073775ABB2961B535@daebe102.NOE.Nokia.com> <f7c7d76e0811140119k7ca6a799oeefe0d8dc8111167@mail.gmail.com> <4920E121.5090102@gmail.com> <f7c7d76e0811171203q77763329m21c79469d56f5582@mail.gmail.com> <4921D200.3070506@gmail.com> <200812031556.mB3FuuPJ004273@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <200812031556.mB3FuuPJ004273@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
Cc: john.loughney@nokia.com, ipv6@ietf.org, "16ng@ietf.org" <16ng@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [16NG] Node Req: Issue 6: Support for RFC 5121: IP version 6 over WiMAX
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org

On 2008-12-04 04:56, Thomas Narten wrote:
> Upleveling for a minute, why are we even including Link Layers in the
> Node *Requirements* doc?
> 
> Clearly, we aren't *requiring* any of them, since choice of
> appropriate L2s depends on the environment.

...
> How about removing all of the individual subections (4.1 - 4.3) and
> add a simple table that lists the IPv6 over Foo documents that folk
> might want to be aware of.

100% agreement.

   Brian
_______________________________________________
16NG mailing list
16NG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email