Re: [16NG] approving the ps-goals document

["Daniel Park" <[e-mail]>]

My suggestion was "clarify" instead of "define". I am still prefer
"clarify" to "review". But the change is also ok for me.

Daniel Park

On Dec 22, 2007 4:50 AM, gabriel montenegro
<[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Looks good.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Jari Arkko <[e-mail]>
> To: gabriel montenegro <[e-mail]>
> Cc: Daniel Park <[e-mail]>om>; [e-mail]; "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)"
> <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 10:46:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [16NG] approving the ps-goals document
>
>
> gabriel montenegro kirjoitti:
> > I did change the section 3 title before ver 4 came out, so this editor
> > note is not needed:
>
> Ah. But the note is about changing the ack for Dave's work on the
> overview section. However, you've already changed it... but as I look at
> -04, there's still an incorrect section pointer in the ack. It should
> say Section 3, not Section 4.
>
> > As for the MIB, I have a couple of observations. There is already
> > plenty of MIB work going on in 802.16.
> > My suggestion is to liaise with 802.16 in order to have 16ng review
> > and comment on those (bringing in
> > the proper MIB doctor support). Upon rechartering, we can decide if
> > the work can continue to live in 802.16.
> > After all, the IETF has lately pushed MIB work to the owners of
> > underlying technologies, so some MIBs have
> > gone back to IEEE.
> >
> > Because of this, I'd reword the management goal as:
> >
> >    Goal #6. Review management requirements and specifically the
> >    interfaces and specific management model (objects) for IP
> >    over 802.16 in collaboration with IEEE 802.16.
> Right. Thanks for this observation.
>
> Here's the updated RFC Editor notes:
>
>   In the Abstract, please change "running the IETF IP protocols
>   over IEEE 802.16" to "running IP over 802.16".
>
>   In Section 1, please change the first occurrence of "BS" to
>   "Base Station (BS)". Similarly, change the first occurrence
>   of "SS" to "Subscriber Station (SS)".
>
>   Also in Section 1, please change "within the current 16ng WG scope"
>   to "within the current scope of IETF efforts".
>
>   In Section 4,1, please change "within the scope of 16ng" to
>   "within the scope of ongoing IETF work".
>
>   In Section 4.1, please change "not to wake up sleep/idle
>   [IEEE802.16e] SSs" to "SSs which are in the sleep/idle mode
>   [IEEE802.16e]".
>
>   In Section 4.3, please change "the problem of waking up the
>   sleep/idle [IEEE802.16e] SSs" to "the problem of waking up SSs
>   which are in sleep/idle mode [IEEE802.16e]".
>
>   In Section 4.4, please add the following to the end:
>
>     Goal #6. Review management requirements and specifically the
>     interfaces and specific management model (objects) for IP
>     over 802.16 in collaboration with IEEE 802.16.
>
>   In Section 7, please change "16ng WG" to "IETF 16ng Working Group".
>
>   In Section 8, please change as follows:
>
>   OLD:
>     section 4
>   NEW:
>     section 3
>
>
>
>


_______________________________________________
16NG mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng