Re: [16NG] RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-16ng-ps-goals (IP over 802.16Problem Statement and Goals) to Informational RFC

Hi Dan/Daniel,

I am not agreeing about the Daniel's suggestion without understanding the rational of that issue and having the feedback from the 16ng WG members.

The 802.16f  TG defined a MIB for the base specification and 802.16i TG is defining a Mobile MIB.
Are there any problems in those MIBs or is there something else regarding the mentioned management interface?
More clarification would be helpful to clearly understand the issue. 

Anyway, it's something *new* which have not occurred during the previous 16ng WG discussions.
I am not sure we can add something in the official WG document without having a common understanding and consensus regarding that.

-Junghoon

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Daniel Park" <soohongp@gmail.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
Cc: <ietf@ietf.org>; <16ng@ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: [16NG] RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-16ng-ps-goals (IP over 802.16Problem Statement and Goals) to Informational RFC

> 
> Dan,
> 
> Sorry for the loooong delay.
> 
> That's an interesting issue. As a part of goal of 16ng, it seems to be
> valuable work. First, let me double check what's going on in IEEE
> 802.16 and WiMAX forum in terms of management method, then get back to
> you with further clarification.
> 
> I think network management method can be addressed in a separated
> draft if necessary later. Now, just adding a simple sentence into PS
> and Goal document is doable to move it forward...
> 
> For example:
> 
> Goal # X: Clarification the network management method of IP over IEEE
> 802.16 for IP and/or Ethernet CS.
> 
> What do you think ?
> 
> Daniel Park
> Co-chair, 16NG Working Group
> 
> 
> On 12/11/07, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:
>>
>> The current version of the document completely lacks any information
>> regarding manageability of networks that run IP over IEEE 802.16. At a
>> minimum I would expect a short discussion about the interfaces model of
>> an IP over 802.16 or have the definition of such a model as well as of a
>> standard management interface mentioned as goals in Section 4.4.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: The IESG [mailto:iesg-secretary@ietf.org]
>> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 5:41 PM
>> > To: IETF-Announce
>> > Cc: 16ng@ietf.org
>> > Subject: Last Call: draft-ietf-16ng-ps-goals (IP over 802.16
>> > Problem Statement and Goals) to Informational RFC
>> >
>> > The IESG has received a request from the IP over IEEE 802.16
>> > Networks WG
>> > (16ng) to consider the following document:
>> >
>> > - 'IP over 802.16 Problem Statement and Goals '
>> >    <draft-ietf-16ng-ps-goals-03.txt> as an Informational RFC
>> >
>> > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and
>> > solicits final comments on this action.  Please send
>> > substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by
>> > 2007-12-10. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to
>> > iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
>> > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>> >
>> > The file can be obtained via
>> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-16ng-ps-goals-03.txt
>> >
>> >
>> > IESG discussion can be tracked via
>> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=vie
>> > w_id&dTag=15284&rfc_flag=0
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > IETF-Announce mailing list
>> > IETF-Announce@ietf.org
>> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 16NG mailing list
>> 16NG@ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 16NG mailing list
> 16NG@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng