[16NG] Maximum sustained traffic rate
vasanth varathan varathan <vasanth.varathan@gmail.com> Wed, 25 February 2009 14:13 UTC
Return-Path: <vasanth.varathan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 16ng@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 16ng@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41123A6846 for <16ng@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:13:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b9ZaBHCxXdoZ for <16ng@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:13:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.29]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEE63A67FD for <16ng@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:13:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so46420yxm.49 for <16ng@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:13:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=vOeK4mkdzaU5qOVGuFnxgMOFEQNfxzLQTMskjVLn5XE=; b=xFzJW2FvOSjlGx2Bi1dwNLQ51lb9p9UMRC/gLX7OJfD3v7jsHR7o3UkgBeM/whhH/u KU/v62pOKrUAgO8IF1m5rCccEmEfiwDJ7mxZMmj/Cnvw0bmkNy2Tah6aikMzrEZTO3WJ LA5gm57EYL9W5jNxYu3dIIZQmyh5OIqI5Gifc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=HRCzsWgc68uJ/715MYT6Qbgzp1VbtR1cSao1Br1ZiFcwDunPvC2DAIdy/KfA/sDoXC b+ZkJuSEUQrW971w+IVOP8uVcT4rwKsxQU7kuX5cJJDAebDK2LpW1hyEU9yefdskwrYC 6Q7afwwB/+cBdtmBiJPY0hYttdJ4BmHscRirg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.19.204 with SMTP id c12mr168033ibb.55.1235571208367; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:13:28 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:43:28 +0530
Message-ID: <595262710902250613o756c30d4w246e2edc4003bb1c@mail.gmail.com>
From: vasanth varathan varathan <vasanth.varathan@gmail.com>
To: 16ng@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00221532cf6cf82f580463bed6b8"
Subject: [16NG] Maximum sustained traffic rate
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:13:09 -0000
Dear all, I have a general doubt. Assume we have a WiMAX subscriber station with a service level agreement (SLA) of 256 kbps. (i.e he has subscribed from the service provider with a maximum date rate of 256 kbps) So my question is, for all his transport connection (may be UGS, eRtps, Rtps, BE) the maximum sustained trafic rate *should* be less than or equal to 256 kbps???? Thanks for your time Regards Vasanth
- [16NG] Maximum sustained traffic rate vasanth varathan varathan