RE: [16NG] Fw: I-DACTION:draft-madanapalli-16ng-ipv4-over-802-dot-16-ipcs-00.txt

"Narvaez, Paolo \(Paolo\)" <paolo@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 09 February 2007 22:41 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFeQi-0006ZU-2E; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:41:20 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFeQh-0006ZK-7G for 16ng@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:41:19 -0500
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com ([135.245.0.33]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFeQd-0006Qv-PC for 16ng@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:41:19 -0500
Received: from ilexp01.ndc.lucent.com (h135-3-39-1.lucent.com [135.3.39.1]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id l19Mf81F014325; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:41:08 -0600 (CST)
Received: from ILEXC2U02.ndc.lucent.com ([135.3.39.9]) by ilexp01.ndc.lucent.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:41:08 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [16NG] Fw: I-DACTION:draft-madanapalli-16ng-ipv4-over-802-dot-16-ipcs-00.txt
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:41:07 -0600
Message-ID: <61B0DCC9767CDC4C91769592B12CCDD133A63F@ILEXC2U02.ndc.lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <004f01c74bdf$92a69790$8046fea9@your655e9d6f61>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [16NG] Fw: I-DACTION:draft-madanapalli-16ng-ipv4-over-802-dot-16-ipcs-00.txt
Thread-Index: AcdL3+NIkEo7RK6VSl+ERehzqYbNqQAuqK9Q
References: <004f01c74bdf$92a69790$8046fea9@your655e9d6f61>
From: "Narvaez, Paolo \(Paolo\)" <paolo@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com>, <16ng@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Feb 2007 22:41:08.0577 (UTC) FILETIME=[64102510:01C74C9B]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f
Cc:
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org

I have two general comments on this draft.

1. Section 7 assumes that ARP messages sent by the MS are received by
the AR. The section states that ARP messages should be dropped by the
AR. However, since ARP runs directly over Ethernet (there is no IP
header) how can the 802.16 IPCS carry this type of packet over the air?

2. What is the subnet assignment? Can two MSs be on the same subnet? Or
do we need to introduce some restrictions as in the IPv6-over-802.16
draft.

Regards,
Paolo


 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Park [mailto:soohong.park@samsung.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 7:17 PM
> To: 16ng@ietf.org
> Subject: [16NG] Fw: 
> I-DACTION:draft-madanapalli-16ng-ipv4-over-802-dot-16-ipcs-00.txt
> 
> IPv4CS document is now available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-madanapalli-16ng-ipv
> 4-over-802-dot-16-ipcs-00.txt
> 
> Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
> Mobile Convergence Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 16NG mailing list
> 16NG@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng
> 

_______________________________________________
16NG mailing list
16NG@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng