[16NG] My comment about draft-ietf-mipshop-fh80216e-01 during the 16ng meeting

"Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)" <jonne.soininen@nsn.com> Tue, 24 July 2007 00:20 UTC

Return-path: <16ng-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ID88n-0004Bu-KZ; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:20:41 -0400
Received: from 16ng by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1ID88m-0004Bp-KZ for 16ng-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:20:40 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ID88m-0004Bh-9U for 16ng@ietf.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:20:40 -0400
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.171] helo=mgw-ext12.nokia.com) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ID88l-0006be-MT for 16ng@ietf.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:20:40 -0400
Received: from esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh108.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.145]) by mgw-ext12.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id l6O0KZqs016630 for <16ng@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:20:37 +0300
Received: from esebh104.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.34]) by esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:20:35 +0300
Received: from esebe199.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.143]) by esebh104.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:20:36 +0300
Received: from 10.241.59.180 ([10.241.59.180]) by esebe199.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.143]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 00:20:35 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.6.070618
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:20:33 +0300
From: "Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)" <jonne.soininen@nsn.com>
To: "16ng@ietf.org" <16ng@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C2CB2081.4A950%jonne.soininen@nsn.com>
Thread-Topic: My comment about draft-ietf-mipshop-fh80216e-01 during the 16ng meeting
Thread-Index: AcfNiHLhsbL3wDl7EdyNjwAWy5ylJg==
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jul 2007 00:20:36.0206 (UTC) FILETIME=[74CB10E0:01C7CD88]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d
Subject: [16NG] My comment about draft-ietf-mipshop-fh80216e-01 during the 16ng meeting
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org

Hello,

I was asked to write my comment I made during the 16ng meeting to the
mailing list. So, here it comes.

I commented during the meeting that I was a bit worried about the Wimax
related references in the -01 to the Wimax and the usage of FMIP in it. I
said that I was worried about talking about how Wimax should, could, or
possibly would use FMIP in the Wimax architecture in an IETF document as
Wimax is a specific architecture defined by the Wimax Forum. Thus, IETF
should not tell how they should use fmip without a very good reason, but it
should be left for the Wimax Forum to do.

I haven't have time to look at the version -02, yet. I don't know if the
confusion persists there.

I hope this helps.

Cheers,

Jonne.
-- 
Jonne Soininen
Nokia Siemens Networks

Tel: +358 40 527 46 34
E-mail: jonne.soininen@nsn.com




_______________________________________________
16NG mailing list
16NG@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng