Re: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval
Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com> Fri, 23 November 2007 17:26 UTC
Return-path: <16ng-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1IvcI4-0001qO-NE; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:26:08 -0500
Received: from 16ng by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1IvcI3-0001pm-5w
for 16ng-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:26:07 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IvcI2-0001pd-Ql
for 16ng@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:26:06 -0500
Received: from web84106.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.206.193])
by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IvcI2-0000DL-72
for 16ng@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:26:06 -0500
Received: (qmail 1025 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Nov 2007 17:26:05 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID;
b=PNjdyW9AJKWkN68XG0rVB7uy4DzInmmupPcox87I8Sz5J1cMVRQ8XSFuWa3fEcx+oNWP1cwQl8IanVgn+gDg/KC5np3njN1rkXsk/HmZWl/30HgTiRe/4q0SYcaVwR+iaq/5haYh5m4690/CSwirgE+W6fjFdX553CTuEgimbXs=;
X-YMail-OSG: PTWTt7YVM1lmOi2XhU8i45nWdhdQnV8jpWuvWNwwiL_4GTMckoVBWBtSkCfIXeA8rwVyCyoYFCMiThy_tt3uAADpugTkcuReKdJ.rQeu0FOdkDswEeQ-
Received: from [71.123.247.57] by web84106.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:26:05 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/818.27 YahooMailWebService/0.7.152
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:26:05 -0800 (PST)
From: Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval
To: "Premec, Domagoj" <domagoj.premec@siemens.com>,
Junghoon Jee <junghoon.jee@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <130650.104.qm@web84106.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: f66b12316365a3fe519e75911daf28a8
Cc: 16ng@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>,
<mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>,
<mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0055169884=="
Errors-To: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org
NUD is part of the neighbor discovery protocol defined in RFC 4861. I think that the protocol was designed with the shared links in mind. On PtP links it would have a very simplified operation. I agree with Junghoon, we need to find answers to his questions. Regards, Behcet ----- Original Message ---- From: "Premec, Domagoj" <domagoj.premec@siemens.com> To: Junghoon Jee <junghoon.jee@gmail.com> Cc: 16ng@ietf.org Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 9:16:09 AM Subject: RE: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval Hi Junghoon, > To maintain the IP reachability through neighbor > discovery packets, yes, I need to send them. Host probes neighbor for reachability only when it has packets to send. > However, those packets can wake up idle/sleep SS. Host in the idle mode will not have any packets for sending and thus will not initiate NUD. domagoj ________________________________ From: Junghoon Jee [mailto:junghoon.jee@gmail.com] Sent: 23. studeni 2007 13:09 To: Jari Arkko Cc: 16ng@ietf.org Subject: Re: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval To maintain the IP reachability through neighbor discovery packets, yes, I need to send them. However, those packets can wake up idle/sleep SS. What can we recommend in this situation? Junghoon 2007/11/23, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>et>: > > >Because of the PtP link type there is no question about an MS being > transitioned out of Idle mode because of ND. > > So, we should not send neighbor discovery packets in case of the IPv6CS? No, you send them when you need to. Jari _______________________________________________ 16NG mailing list 16NG@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng
_______________________________________________ 16NG mailing list 16NG@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng
- [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval Jari Arkko
- Re: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval Junghoon Jee
- Re: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval Basavaraj Patil
- Re: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval Junghoon Jee
- Re: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval Syam Madanapalli
- Re: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval Jari Arkko
- Re: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval Junghoon Jee
- Re: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval Junghoon Jee
- Re: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval Syam Madanapalli
- RE: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval Premec, Domagoj
- Re: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval Jari Arkko
- Re: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval Junghoon Jee
- RE: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval John.zhao
- Re: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval John.zhao
- RE: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval keshav.chawla
- RE: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval John.zhao