[16NG] SFID's
"vasanth varathan varathan" <vasanth.varathan@gmail.com> Sat, 24 March 2007 13:35 UTC
Return-path: <16ng-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1HV6P4-0003vu-Ll; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:35:30 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HV6P3-0003vp-Or
for 16ng@ietf.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:35:29 -0400
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.249])
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HV6P2-0003pQ-Gx
for 16ng@ietf.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:35:29 -0400
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d30so1604690and
for <16ng@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 06:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
b=be+0mTZeXdrjU5n7jIOJleIs4fCLGDYJzGex1QEQ2kOccWXyjYphaqw2Kl7WzgAbrewingCjtn5qNyQ4L1TYRfgJBKAs3X47KFT1H6C/KiliT8q/nNtq+CbwSxKHOdz19kpPBRNW4Rt9aAQZ7WJCcNp9ku8noOSErN6JiAEkq8Q=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
b=NBN0YAhjg7STAeN9O/9Bb9dYqDtRmR109tiuUlrzu6oA18uatFHL4YGfUInwqkBCrEIYiK7D7sUKIDt0kd3jz1p5W1ow3r7K6jp/bXRMPBz66QKL4KI0tVIBhyjQQZHnJPc1Ty3cjw7OxfJSMltrvTE0THUnMxmT6cADH6B1KlE=
Received: by 10.100.47.6 with SMTP id u6mr3457711anu.1174743327787;
Sat, 24 Mar 2007 06:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.142.18 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 06:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <595262710703240635m68b1bda0va062899f6dc34511@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 19:05:27 +0530
From: "vasanth varathan varathan" <vasanth.varathan@gmail.com>
To: 16ng@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9ed51c9d1356100bce94f1ae4ec616a9
Subject: [16NG] SFID's
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>,
<mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>,
<mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0720885967=="
Errors-To: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org
Hi all,
I have a doubt in SFID assigning....
whether the number of service flow indentifier's (SFID's) assigned to a SS
depends on
1. The number of service flow Scheduling types (i.e UGS, Rtps, Nrtps, BE)
supported by the SS???
(or)
2. Different Qos parameter set(like MSR,MRR,latency,jitter,etc...) values
of same service flow scheduling type (i.e UGS, Rtps, Nrtps, BE)?????
Thanks in advance
Vasanth
_______________________________________________ 16NG mailing list 16NG@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng
- [16NG] SFID's vasanth varathan varathan
- Re: [16NG] SFID's yw_chen