Re: [16NG] FW: Call for Review on FMIP6 over IEEE 802.16e Networks

Hi Daniel

Here is my two cents.

The draft is based on RFC4068, and point-to-point link model is also recommended .
RFC4068 is based on shared link model, and is not applicable for point-to-point link model without modification.
So,  there are some basic conflicts in the draft.

Formulation of  a prospective NCoA  is a main idea of  RFC4068. 
But in Point-to-Point link model, it is impossible to formulate the NCoA 
according to  RFC4068 because there is no proper prefix.

BR
Frank

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com>
To: <mipshop@ietf.org>
Cc: <16ng@ietf.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 9:34 PM
Subject: [16NG] FW: Call for Review on FMIP6 over IEEE 802.16e Networks

> To MIPSHOP WG, 
> 
> Here is another expert review on "draft-ietf-mipshop-fh80216e-01",
> particularly, IEEE 802.21 relevant texts in this draft.
> 
> Reviewer (Yoshihiro Ohba) is a IETF official liaison from IEEE 802.21
> 
> Thanks Yoshihiro and hope this helps...
> 
> 
> ----
> 
> Daniel Park & Gabriel Montenegro
> Chairs, 16NG Working Group
> 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> _______________________________________________
> 16NG mailing list
> 16NG@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng
> 

_______________________________________________
16NG mailing list
16NG@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng