IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [16NG] multiple encapsulation issue

Bruno Miguel Sousa <bmsousa@dei.uc.pt> Sun, 18 March 2007 18:30 UTC

Return-path: <16ng-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HT09c-00022v-KP; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 14:30:52 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HT09b-00022q-8q for 16ng@ietf.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 14:30:51 -0400
Received: from smtp.dei.uc.pt ([193.137.203.228] helo=smtp2.dei.uc.pt) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HT09Y-0008PN-NI for 16ng@ietf.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 14:30:51 -0400
Received: from [130.129.19.224] ([130.129.19.224]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp2.dei.uc.pt (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l2IIUSnJ012955 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:30:28 GMT
Message-ID: <45FD8536.2080902@dei.uc.pt>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:30:14 +0000
From: Bruno Miguel Sousa <bmsousa@dei.uc.pt>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [16NG] multiple encapsulation issue
References: <f7c7d76e0703140905q7c0251e7o36e01ad41ed89376@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f7c7d76e0703140905q7c0251e7o36e01ad41ed89376@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-FCTUC-DEI-SIC-MailScanner-Information: Please contact helpdesk@dei.uc.pt for more information
X-FCTUC-DEI-SIC-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-FCTUC-DEI-SIC-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-51.432, required 3, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.37, L_SMTP_AUTH -50.00)
X-FCTUC-DEI-SIC-MailScanner-From: bmsousa@dei.uc.pt
X-Spam-Status: No
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d
Cc: 16ng@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org

Hi.

Daniel Park wrote:
> Folks,
>
> As you are aware of, IAB is in the progress of spelling out multiple
> encapsulation considerations. The latest publication is
> draft-iab-link-encaps-08. It indicates lot of considerations to the
> usage of 802.16 multiple convergence sublayers. I am thinking of
> dealing with this issue in this list more detail and precise than now.
> I believe it would be valuable effort at this stage prior to moving
> this document forward.
>
> What do you think ?
>
> Question 1: Are you thinking that we need to do this in 16ng ?
> If yes, go to Question 2
Yes, we need.
The questions are pertinent.
> If no, let me know why
>
> Question 2: How many folks are willing to work on that together ?
> Most activities are to analyze IAB document first and make a clear
> answer to all of considerations. If necessary, drafting would be good
> for folks information.
One more.
Tomorrow I can present myself to Alexandru Petrescu and others volunteers
to this work.


_______________________________________________
16NG mailing list
16NG@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email