[16NG] Review on FMIP6 over IEEE 802.16e Networks

"Daniel Park" <soohongp@gmail.com> Wed, 09 May 2007 10:37 UTC

Return-path: <16ng-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HljYN-0003ms-2Y; Wed, 09 May 2007 06:37:51 -0400
Received: from 16ng by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HljYL-0003ml-KV for 16ng-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 09 May 2007 06:37:49 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HljYL-0003mX-7n for 16ng@ietf.org; Wed, 09 May 2007 06:37:49 -0400
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.236]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HljYK-0003RA-0l for 16ng@ietf.org; Wed, 09 May 2007 06:37:49 -0400
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 71so147251wri for <16ng@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 May 2007 03:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=P8ZkMraw72azeDteeSu8HYzdKYiaA5DjNA+ocglwJdEPFwgpL55xjTLJ6/afGjvxoa4LdUb0tWMDiLVBKjfJAIFQWoDdjZtkA69Sb8IXRqkUAcdD68VJ9ta9SkiBHRnDUXljTNZS5582IU06XcIegu950mY4ttGSZoAF3VSQgAg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=lVffWUVkGH0mgquhmA6RSbdjpQZc5ipCj34BVw9+cbA9TKT3Izz8bkLTbp+AcYJ+PdaYEuEUYjzX0opwAHVCAuj0GyOGQZxNF3A3P7/q591gbRXDX+RcQ9tsBbB5lnvzxj/sdhM+pNr3u+TuD4lL7sy2YLFLhiIM1PeD2OY0vSI=
Received: by 10.114.53.1 with SMTP id b1mr115889waa.1178707065071; Wed, 09 May 2007 03:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.115.94.7 with HTTP; Wed, 9 May 2007 03:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <f7c7d76e0705090337l42c0826bxda14499b510cca4e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 19:37:45 +0900
From: "Daniel Park" <soohongp@gmail.com>
To: mipshop@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17
Cc: "16ng@ietf.org" <16ng@ietf.org>
Subject: [16NG] Review on FMIP6 over IEEE 802.16e Networks
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org

To MIPSHOP WG,

Here is an official review by 16NG expert as Jinhyeock Choi. Also, two
more experts are in the progress of reviewing this document. They will
get back to MIPSHOP soon.

=================

I went over the draft and overall it looks fine. It presents an useful
information to efficiently run FMIPv6 over 802.16e with primitives.

I found no technical issue except one.

There are incorrect statements in Sec 3 Deployment Architecture. For
example, there can be more than 2 subnets in figure 1, whereas it's
written that 'Figure 1 shows the deployment with two IP subnets'. In
fact there can be as many subnets as the # of MNs according to
per-MN-prefix link/subnet model. I recommend to re-write the section
or remove it altogether. IMO, the draft will do fine without the
section.

I have a few more comments but they are all editorial. I'll send them
to the authors in a separate mail.

Thanks in advance for your kind consideration.

Best Regards

JinHyeock

=================

Hope this helps...

-- Daniel Park


_______________________________________________
16NG mailing list
16NG@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng