Re: [16NG] Fwd: Node Req: Issue 6: Support for RFC 5121: IP version 6over WiMAX
"Riegel, Maximilian (NSN - DE/Munich)" <maximilian.riegel@nsn.com> Fri, 14 November 2008 08:36 UTC
Return-Path: <16ng-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 16ng-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-16ng-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358613A6A39; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:36:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 16ng@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 16ng@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FE63A6A39 for <16ng@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:36:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IpmuTPjSt8o3 for <16ng@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:36:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [217.115.75.234]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37D63A6A27 for <16ng@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:36:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mAE8aCrn011445 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:36:12 +0100
Received: from demuexc022.nsn-intra.net (webmail.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.35]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mAE8a7Ki005142; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:36:11 +0100
Received: from DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.25]) by demuexc022.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:36:11 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:36:11 +0100
Message-ID: <BC27158B99D3064A955ADE084783900C01666CE6@DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <f7c7d76e0811132212x427ef06aub634e857705bfaed@mail.gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [16NG] Fwd: Node Req: Issue 6: Support for RFC 5121: IP version 6over WiMAX
Thread-Index: AclGIAc9z3nK065xTyGOqUTwHLp8FAADVwHg
References: <4BACF58443A3A04688976073775ABB2961B535@daebe102.NOE.Nokia.com> <f7c7d76e0811132212x427ef06aub634e857705bfaed@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Riegel, Maximilian (NSN - DE/Munich)" <maximilian.riegel@nsn.com>
To: Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Nov 2008 08:36:11.0355 (UTC) FILETIME=[0C30FAB0:01C94634]
Cc: 16ng@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [16NG] Fwd: Node Req: Issue 6: Support for RFC 5121: IP version 6over WiMAX
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2077721930=="
Sender: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org
Daniel, There are two ways to transfer IPv6 over WiMAX: - IPv6 over WiMAX using IP-CS: RFC5121 - IPv6 over Ethernet carried over WiMAX. It would be more clear to state the requirement: Nodes supporting IPv6 via IP-CS over WiMAX networks MUST implement "Transmission of IPv6 via the IPv6 Convergence Sublayer over IEEE 802.16 Networks" [RFC 5121]. Thanks Max ________________________________ From: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:16ng-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Daniel Park Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 7:13 AM To: 16ng@ietf.org Subject: [16NG] Fwd: Node Req: Issue 6: Support for RFC 5121: IP version 6over WiMAX FYI, in case you do not follow up IPv6 mailing list. Daniel ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <john.loughney@nokia.com> Date: Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 6:34 AM Subject: Node Req: Issue 6: Support for RFC 5121: IP version 6 over WiMAX To: ipv6@ietf.org Daniel Park sent this issue in: I'd request one more requirement for this bis. It is about 16ng deliverable for IPv6 transmission over IPv6CS networks as RFC 5121. Due to Convergence Sublayer characteristics of WiMAX networks, the below requirement must be included in the Node Requirement. (For example: globally unique prefix must be assigned to the WiMAX node, DAD considerations, ND features, and etc described in RFC 5121) 4.X IP version 6 over WiMAX - RFC 5121 Nodes supporting IPv6 over WiMAX networks MUST implement "Transmission of IPv6 via the IPv6 Convergence Sublayer over IEEE 802.16 Networks" [RFC 5121]. --> I think this seems like a reasonable thing to add. John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ 16NG mailing list 16NG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng
- [16NG] Fwd: Node Req: Issue 6: Support for RFC 51… Daniel Park
- Re: [16NG] Fwd: Node Req: Issue 6: Support for RF… Riegel, Maximilian (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [16NG] Fwd: Node Req: Issue 6: Support for RF… Daniel Park
- Re: [16NG] Node Req: Issue 6: Support for RFC 512… Daniel Park
- Re: [16NG] Node Req: Issue 6: Support for RFC 512… Daniel Park
- Re: [16NG] Node Req: Issue 6: Support for RFC 512… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [16NG] Node Req: Issue 6: Support for RFC 512… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [16NG] Node Req: Issue 6: Support for RFC 512… Thomas Narten
- Re: [16NG] Node Req: Issue 6: Support for RFC 512… Brian E Carpenter