Re: [Mipshop] Re: [16NG] FW: Call for Review on FMIP6 over IEEE 802.16e Networks
Heejin Jang <heejin.jang@samsung.com> Mon, 04 June 2007 04:44 UTC
Return-path: <16ng-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1Hv4Qx-00074s-IA; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:44:47 -0400
Received: from 16ng by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1Hv4Qx-00074k-8j
for 16ng-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:44:47 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1Hv4Qw-00074c-Ux; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:44:46 -0400
Received: from mailout1.samsung.com ([203.254.224.24])
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1Hv4Qv-0000mF-GT; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:44:46 -0400
Received: from ep_ms5_bk (mailout1.samsung.com [203.254.224.24])
by mailout1.samsung.com
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004))
with ESMTP id <0JJ3004U9H5QFW@mailout1.samsung.com>; Mon,
04 Jun 2007 13:44:14 +0900 (KST)
Received: from ep_spt01 (ms5.samsung.com [203.254.225.113])
by ms5.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14
2004)) with ESMTP id <0JJ300KWSH5QXU@ms5.samsung.com>; Mon,
04 Jun 2007 13:44:14 +0900 (KST)
Content-return: prohibited
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 04:44:14 +0000 (GMT)
From: Heejin Jang <heejin.jang@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [Mipshop] Re: [16NG] FW: Call for Review on FMIP6 over IEEE
802.16e Networks
To: Frank Xia <xiayangsong@huawei.com>
Message-id: <11362793.1303151180932254151.JavaMail.weblogic@ep_ml20>
MIME-version: 1.0
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
Msgkey: 20070604044414150@heejin.jang
X-MTR: 20070604044414150@heejin.jang
X-EPLocale: ko_KR.windows-1252
X-EPWebmail-Msg-Type: personal
X-EPWebmail-Reply-Demand: 0
X-EPApproval-Locale:
X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++)
X-Scan-Signature: 4adaf050708fb13be3316a9eee889caa
Cc: "mipshop@ietf.org" <mipshop@ietf.org>, "16ng@ietf.org" <16ng@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: heejin.jang@samsung.com
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>,
<mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>,
<mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1619852242=="
Errors-To: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, Frank & Daniel. RFC4068 describes fast HO procedure based on prediction, including NCoA formulation in advance. However, how to allocate the prefix to MN in NAR (before actual HO) is out of scope in this document as mentioned in Section 4. "The method by which Access Routers exchange information about their neighbors, and thereby allow construction of Proxy Router Advertisements with information about neighboring subnets is outside the scope of this document." Furthermore, the problem you mentioned in draft-xia-mipshop-fmip-ptp-00 is not limited only to 802.16 networks but happens all networks which have point-to-point link such as 3GPP2. I think that it is proper to handle this problem separately. Thanks for your opinion. - Regards, Heejin ------- Original Message ------- Sender : Frank Xia<xiayangsong@huawei.com> Date : 2007-06-01 06:50 Title : [Mipshop] Re: [16NG] FW: Call for Review on FMIP6 over IEEE 802.16e Networks Hi Daniel Here is my two cents. The draft is based on RFC4068, and point-to-point link model is also recommended . RFC4068 is based on shared link model, and is not applicable for point-to-point link model without modification. So, there are some basic conflicts in the draft. Formulation of a prospective NCoA is a main idea of RFC4068. But in Point-to-Point link model, it is impossible to formulate the NCoA according to RFC4068 because there is no proper prefix. BR Frank ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com> To: <mipshop@ietf.org> Cc: <16ng@ietf.org> Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 9:34 PM Subject: [16NG] FW: Call for Review on FMIP6 over IEEE 802.16e Networks > To MIPSHOP WG, > > Here is another expert review on "draft-ietf-mipshop-fh80216e-01", > particularly, IEEE 802.21 relevant texts in this draft. > > Reviewer (Yoshihiro Ohba) is a IETF official liaison from IEEE 802.21 > > Thanks Yoshihiro and hope this helps... > > > ---- > > Daniel Park & Gabriel Montenegro > Chairs, 16NG Working Group > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > 16NG mailing list > 16NG@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng > _______________________________________________ Mipshop mailing list Mipshop@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop
_______________________________________________ 16NG mailing list 16NG@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng
- [16NG] FW: Call for Review on FMIP6 over IEEE 802… Daniel Park
- Re: [16NG] FW: Call for Review on FMIP6 over IEEE… Heejin Jang
- Re: [16NG] FW: Call for Review on FMIP6 over IEEE… Frank Xia
- RE: [Mipshop] Re: [16NG] FW: Call for Review on F… rajeev.koodli
- Re: [Mipshop] Re: [16NG] FW: Call for Review on F… Heejin Jang
- Re: [Mipshop] Re: [16NG] FW: Call for Review on F… Frank Xia
- Re: [Mipshop] Re: [16NG] FW: Call for Review on F… Rajeev Koodli
- Re: [Mipshop] Re: [16NG] FW: Call for Review on F… Rajeev Koodli
- Re: [Mipshop] Re: [16NG] FW: Call for Review on F… Frank Xia
- Re: [Mipshop] Re: [16NG] FW: Call for Review on F… Rajeev Koodli