Re: Comments on gTLD-MOU Leadership [was: Bob shaws misrepresentation of Jeff williams's comments]

Jay Fenello <Jay@Iperdome.com> Tue, 12 May 1998 17:10 UTC

Delivery-Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 13:17:39 -0400
Return-Path: cclark
Received: (from adm@localhost) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) id NAA19526 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Tue, 12 May 1998 13:10:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from camel7.mindspring.com (camel7.mindspring.com [207.69.200.57]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id NAA19439 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 1998 13:05:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from vucqpqlj (user-37kbsuu.dialup.mindspring.com [207.69.243.222]) by camel7.mindspring.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA25400; Tue, 12 May 1998 13:03:01 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.2.32.19980512130248.006a0924@mindspring.com>
X-Sender: iquest1@mindspring.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.2 (32)
Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 13:02:48 -0400
To: Camillo Pasquariello <Camillo.Pasquariello@mci2000.com>
From: Jay Fenello <Jay@Iperdome.com>
Subject: Re: Comments on gTLD-MOU Leadership [was: Bob shaws misrepresentation of Jeff williams's comments]
Cc: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@IX.NETCOM.COM>, Robert Shaw <robert.shaw@itu.int>, DOMAIN-POLICY@LISTS.INTERNIC.NET, IETF ORG <ietf@ietf.org>, Ira <Ira_C._Magaziner@oa.eop.gov>, Jon Postel <postel@ISI.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <355867ED.C3B537B2@mci2000.com>
References: <v01540b02b17cd29e15df@[204.188.254.55]> <3556C3E9.B22AA265@ix.netcom.com> <35582B64.DA7781B1@itu.int> <3557DC06.657E61DA@ix.netcom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 11:17 AM 5/12/98 -0400, Camillo Pasquariello wrote:
>JEFF -
>
>Please speak for yourself [and not the "others"] concerning the
>quality of the gTLD-MOU leadership!
>
>Frankly I'm a bit tired of, and troubled by, the continuing
>aspersions cast on their intentions and integrity by you,
>Fleming, Fenello and others. I find most of your discussion
>tedious, unconvincing, and too much concerned with mud slinging
>rather than specific and well intentioned criticisms of
>substance.
>
>This writer has seen nothing but a great deal of sincere and
>voluntary, hard work by these folks - coupled with a firm
>dedication to the general health and welfare of the global
>Internet. They have, in my view, put forth well reasoned
>proposals, and have always demonstrated, to me, an openness to
>constructive criticism.


Hi Camillo,

While your comments are welcome, it would
be helpful if you identify yourself and your
affiliations.  Are you with MCI (the main U.S.
company supporting the MoU)?

Not having seen your postings before, I can't
help but wonder how long you have been following
the debate.  Most of the deplorable actions that 
we have been describing occurred after the IAHC 
was formed, yet before the USG intervened.

If you are interested, there is semi-complete
summary of the email archives and the Postel
drafts at:
	http://www.newdom.com/archive/

I used the term semi-complete, because there
is a mysterious gap in the historical record.
It appears that the entire IAHC email archives,
*and* the corresponding Newdom email archives
are missing :-(


Regards,

Jay Fenello
President, Iperdome, Inc.  
404-250-3242  http://www.iperdome.com