Re: [3gpp-ietf-coord] IETF

You can also attached a PDF in the tool. However, if that is needed for 3gpp we need to document that clearly somewhere or even ask for tooling support that for 3gpp LS an attachment is required.

> On 17. Mar 2023, at 14:29, Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Yes, this issue has surfaced as a result of having Liaison Statements sent directly from the tool, which is of course a very useful feature (if we get it to work properly).
>  
> Gonzalo
>  
> From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> 
> Sent: Friday, 17 March 2023 14:22
> To: Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>; Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <eckelcu@cisco.com>; 3gpp-ietf-coord@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: IETF - 3GPP coordination meeting at IETF 116
>  
>  
> Right, a long time ago they asked us to simply put the email in a WORD document, which is what we have been doing all along. Alternatively, as you suggest, we could discuss with them so that they update their process and accept emails.
>  
> Well I think there might be some gap here, and the datatracker now sends out emails with the complete LS based on what is entered into the Datatracker and that will go to the 3GPP secretariat. So I think there might be need to have a bit discussion with the tools people here if what we send out should be written into a PDF or something in a structured way, or if there are some intermediate step that doesn’t send out the LS before it has been put into a form that the receiver body will find acceptable.
>  
> Cheers
>  
> Magnus
>  
> _______________________________________________
> 3gpp-ietf-coord mailing list
> 3gpp-ietf-coord@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/3gpp-ietf-coord

Re: [3gpp-ietf-coord] IETF - 3GPP coordination meeting at IETF 116