Re: [5gangip] Feedback on draft-xyzy-atick-gaps-00

Hi,

> On 4 Jun 2018, at 22:24, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> wrote:
> 
> As in previous versions, I think this one jumps into talking about
> specific solutions too quickly before articulating the problem. I
> would make section 3 either be "Problem statement" or "Requirements”.

May be that part can leverage on the PS document. No? We do not need to re-state everything. 

> In either case, the text should be generic for any solutions. For
> axmaple, some requirements might look like:
> 
> * A mapping system is needed to map identifier to locator
> * Access to the mapping system must done only by authorized entities.
> * Mapping system must mitigate DOS attack
> * IP addresses should not expose specific geo-location of users.
> 
> etc...
> 
> Once the problem or requirments are laid out, then it makes sense to
> talk about the specific solutions (should be section 4 in my model),
> how they try to address the problems and what their shortcomings are.
> 
> I like the idea of section "General recommendations". This would be
> section 5 in the model I'm describing, but I suspect this is not
> complete. It should be driven to satisfy the requirements or solve the
> problem specified in the earlier section.

and highlight the gaps between existing solutions and the requirements … ;-)

Ciao

L.

> Drawing parts from the
> specific solutions makes sense.
> 
> Tom
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 5gangip mailing list
> 5gangip@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/5gangip