Re: [5gangip] New Version Notification for draft-xyzy-atick-gaps-00.txt

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Thu, 07 June 2018 10:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: 5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2505130ED3 for <5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 03:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d8a6s41sXEpl for <5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 03:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com (mail-wm0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 698DB130DFF for <5gangip@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 03:13:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id x6-v6so16750165wmc.3 for <5gangip@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 03:13:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=vM1Pkd7jyweFQbiQOEPrN59ERuHMxwYmXQ2KAEwOALs=; b=zNbo4SLdRGry5XIdbB8cYCKkC7ZGIrdOd3qwE/9epTBsHT0T6d6Z94W8GG02Cc6OyD OcyrDJ/fkxxArUNpRNYpfiKJouqNoao9Swlf4LR6OC3C52kLRmZtqHD/jiK66N70CwlE fOjgrC5QS6ct3LhNm3aj0rr+WZ5AuxJwIXqky6Bt7r/t23u7yHZjR7a0JSJGP3Oqalyl nqW65TESqxfQD9xGnMfhSBABbXrpgE+JftnNgmy4k5gQOL86YJeHXt4o9NvpknJDGwxU 2tHZ8NCiiCxjVasvXeIl3q+2eggwO/9EUPiJhFimEJyvOg0xU4vNdLDFYPR1R2ivzNZK X/oQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=vM1Pkd7jyweFQbiQOEPrN59ERuHMxwYmXQ2KAEwOALs=; b=GhX2IcrSHQ5BtjeykaTuhwDuG6snL78QAzYhUvo0ZcYXw+Ap9v66xzjO57ypjD8Ik6 O6g/g989c2+F1/tO1BNtKVgvUsEoiP6APtlXKt+g+h7xzu/Sv5gwMeGMPyg6PMV0AizY je+ZEblPez9PycT1xGmsBgTB99iZeetPLieP3Y35XPPP6KN+C5bwPsz8gCduw4NFqvbb AMTxIDjWZINRSJhBeOZojlHPaBeHHp19Nq4ESXwpf751wN2KGMOldB8ElmVhq/LZbIuY VVfGiKeMJQhTEjgSlkDjI+rUqw2t1RtgFwk7lbasvbrt0dniv5prd11j8eRzhP/3gnP/ jMQg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0oUI5dwUidg8juMFTZHBXvZ/OCpTgW+v+7osNgux4obtJeZqNq WBLTu+9GxCWe1b3OSFn5GdMS41D/huA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJHTYezAMKh6vumMxis6WAIw63z0nOmv8Gcusv+orhuKonRoNntv5WN7M+hzswtIqQRwWdoiw==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:e80f:: with SMTP id f15-v6mr1110554wmh.137.1528366423810; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 03:13:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 2a01cb0404892000e89c2715b61197f3.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr (2a01cb0404892000e89c2715b61197f3.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr. [2a01:cb04:489:2000:e89c:2715:b611:97f3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y186-v6sm2080553wmd.38.2018.06.07.03.13.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Jun 2018 03:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Message-Id: <F5E27567-7D26-4C10-9327-AF7A6FA3712B@gigix.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_38AFF1D5-5402-41F9-A5D8-98A009C4162B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\))
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 12:13:40 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1AFE10CF28AE8B4C9663445736B8034D3826A13C@CAFRFD1MSGUSRJI.ITServices.sbc.com>
Cc: Saleem Bhatti <saleem@st-andrews.ac.uk>, 5GANGIP <5gangip@ietf.org>
To: "FIGURELLE, TERRY F" <tf2934@att.com>
References: <CAC8QAcfuk6e+JPuKC4sw=FPYSgO3Tkr5mjSRJeOzvjxUSc9xFw@mail.gmail.com> <B300114A-8838-4FE2-8FA9-95BA4CD07089@st-andrews.ac.uk> <C42C02FB-4452-4D4F-A826-F24D401BB76D@gigix.net> <1AFE10CF28AE8B4C9663445736B8034D3826A13C@CAFRFD1MSGUSRJI.ITServices.sbc.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/5gangip/LpjQvqVn6pG9Q6XUc71gRAbHfzg>
Subject: Re: [5gangip] New Version Notification for draft-xyzy-atick-gaps-00.txt
X-BeenThere: 5gangip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of implications of the upcoming 5th Generation \(fixed and\) Mobile communication systems on IP protocols." <5gangip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/5gangip>, <mailto:5gangip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/5gangip/>
List-Post: <mailto:5gangip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:5gangip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/5gangip>, <mailto:5gangip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 10:13:51 -0000


> On 6 Jun 2018, at 23:58, FIGURELLE, TERRY F <tf2934@att.com> wrote:
> 
> Switches may be impact and any layer2 element is impacted if they are optimized for GTP. Why? Because at layer2 hashing across multiple fibers is sensitive to traffic. With GTP they use  TEID to get good hashing over fibers in a bundle. This is typically just configuration and mostly we use switch/router instead of pure switch. We had same challenges with load balancers and firewalls but all now scale and hash for GTP.
>  
> Said another way, mobile operators have been supporting GTP for a very long time. Over that time it is likely some optimizations were leveraged to improve layer2 systems in the paths for  traffic.

How complex are those optimisations? Cannot be adapted to any other encapsulation solution (usually is just a hash….)


> They also likely have security solution for GTP traffic too.

Security is a broad term, can you be more specific?

Ciao

L;



> So those gaps need to be closed.
>  
> From: 5gangip <5gangip-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:5gangip-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Luigi Iannone
> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 1:33 AM
> To: Saleem Bhatti <saleem@st-andrews.ac.uk <mailto:saleem@st-andrews.ac.uk>>
> Cc: 5GANGIP <5gangip@ietf.org <mailto:5gangip@ietf.org>>
> Subject: Re: [5gangip] New Version Notification for draft-xyzy-atick-gaps-00.txt
>  
> Hi,
>  
> 
> 
> On 28 May 2018, at 19:16, Saleem Bhatti <saleem@st-andrews.ac.uk <mailto:saleem@st-andrews.ac.uk>> wrote:
>  
> There is some text which is incorrect - on page 4:
> 
> ----
>    Furthermore, ILNP demands a change in the way local (e.g., within a
>    LAN) communication is carried out, needing all of the devices to
>    support ILNP.  This in turn may raise heavy deployability issues.
> ----
> 
> This is not true - "all devices" do *not* need to be updated, but only those end-systems that wish to use ILNPv6. Switches
>  
> Switches clearly do not need to be changed since they are L2. 
> 
> 
> and routers
>  
> You need to implement the ILCC in your first hop router. 
>  
> Then you need new ICMP messages, and few other tricks here and there in existing stuff.
> Other solutions are more clear because introduce new entities and protocol, so either you have it or you don’t.
>  
> Yet, may be the last sentence can be soften deleting  “heavy”.
>  
> Ciao
>  
> L.
>  
> 
> 
> do not need to be updated, as ILNPv6 is backwards compatible with IPv6. It is possible to run an ILNPv6 node in a LAN which also has non-ILNPv6 nodes.
>  
> Cheers,
> --/Saleem
>  
> 
> 
> On 25 May 2018, at 15:50, Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com <mailto:sarikaya2012@gmail.com>> wrote:
>  
> Hi all, 
>  
> We have submitted the gaps draft. Those who have contributed text are listed as co-authors.
> Please send your comments to the list.
>  
> Regards,
> Dirk& Behcet
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-xyzy-atick-gaps-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Behcet Sarikaya and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:           draft-xyzy-atick-gaps
> Revision:       00
> Title:          Gap and Solution Space Analysis for End to End Privacy Enabled Mapping System
> Document date:  2018-05-25
> Group:          Individual Submission
> Pages:          10
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-xyzy-atick-gaps-00.txt <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_internet-2Ddrafts_draft-2Dxyzy-2Datick-2Dgaps-2D00.txt&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=tO_sNxa2NTxwl2paJIf4zw&m=J5-PU3DJmZhSj-6OvHFxPeu4aAW27BIBzAhnulGrcdI&s=JHCjCG90b48mXx2Mli_4FNx3qy80mb6fi-Kr4Z2dAu8&e=>
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xyzy-atick-gaps/ <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dxyzy-2Datick-2Dgaps_&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=tO_sNxa2NTxwl2paJIf4zw&m=J5-PU3DJmZhSj-6OvHFxPeu4aAW27BIBzAhnulGrcdI&s=t5QGiu_jAW_cH1P0JkFVW2ESNVahK7obQU0waTiM2wY&e=>
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xyzy-atick-gaps-00 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dxyzy-2Datick-2Dgaps-2D00&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=tO_sNxa2NTxwl2paJIf4zw&m=J5-PU3DJmZhSj-6OvHFxPeu4aAW27BIBzAhnulGrcdI&s=5znCd2jz7p4APVeDGBdJR8QIV90W9mTYFft0Ud_kLrg&e=>
> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-xyzy-atick-gaps <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_html_draft-2Dxyzy-2Datick-2Dgaps&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=tO_sNxa2NTxwl2paJIf4zw&m=J5-PU3DJmZhSj-6OvHFxPeu4aAW27BIBzAhnulGrcdI&s=CLW3JOJZwQYB-apye4JxkAsH1Kl-Z5_IPqaj31fsX4I&e=>
> 
> 
> Abstract:
>    This document presents a gap and solution analysis for end-to-end
>    privacy enabled mapping systems.  Each of the identifier locator
>    separation system has its own approach to mapping identifiers to the
>    locators.  We analyse all these approaches and identify the gaps in
>    each of them and do a solution space analysis in an attempt to
>    identify a mapping system that can be end to end privacy enabled.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__tools.ietf.org_&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=tO_sNxa2NTxwl2paJIf4zw&m=J5-PU3DJmZhSj-6OvHFxPeu4aAW27BIBzAhnulGrcdI&s=pnlPaw7b14RkC63Q6o1vR1d9DPP7T-GkJxgti99nE6E&e=>.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> 5gangip mailing list
> 5gangip@ietf.org <mailto:5gangip@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/5gangip <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_5gangip&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=tO_sNxa2NTxwl2paJIf4zw&m=J5-PU3DJmZhSj-6OvHFxPeu4aAW27BIBzAhnulGrcdI&s=XBUCO8KnEDmfXcxVrQBRrbx98CQRqJmRkKwwYbOpVqg&e=>
>  
> _______________________________________________
> 5gangip mailing list
> 5gangip@ietf.org <mailto:5gangip@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/5gangip <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_5gangip&d=DwQFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=tO_sNxa2NTxwl2paJIf4zw&m=J5-PU3DJmZhSj-6OvHFxPeu4aAW27BIBzAhnulGrcdI&s=XBUCO8KnEDmfXcxVrQBRrbx98CQRqJmRkKwwYbOpVqg&e=>