Re: [5gangip] Network tokens draft

Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> Fri, 10 July 2020 13:51 UTC

Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074EB3A0CF8 for <5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 06:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WuopdQRlDDG3 for <5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 06:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd30.google.com (mail-io1-xd30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 606223A09DE for <5gangip@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 06:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd30.google.com with SMTP id q74so6097128iod.1 for <5gangip@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 06:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=j6qhxfKpV/e1nwjm+a25FXBXz3sZpepp2D+lr6m9K9Y=; b=H4ZQLmoaQRP5neic8ufuzQ63GvZYxx98t252h1gihgxO3ivnTkt6KePzNEB50sT8FN mglJlspwViig1QIodFsTo3TLqpvkjXgG9sMqc8+vkvrCGIj/kdvLqYeJ3IP0EvR/CkjY cyqhHDT9VmQh1vmLFcw9uNxo7QOhEFokp5mZVE6dF1Dd/mm21af/LT2CFHaE+AAisJ48 WSUYIsz6rwoP+eATi7Z+3JA0lpC1MuQumkg2pLXBXsSl3YeiRTR9MDi3coGinMiz005k 9GG/FgEGYFaAbfbuek2sEbY/gwk9lG8LD1/dByX7gEISjyZMy+8dbMij5x87nlaoZagv IcxQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=j6qhxfKpV/e1nwjm+a25FXBXz3sZpepp2D+lr6m9K9Y=; b=uZsDEcOS7PIhEvszSr2jZTv6aen0H21bN0+nZc5sNCSrFfoamxljioqIcNi4c1WAi4 8GwCkezv8ssAYdkwmUZ+h5wKXfPHW+ewpfmo2JxnNPaMF1V6RubGpGPGeDNT9jEgv7WT gF2SGqmVbG8TuNkdnA4gw0xvFeSZGPjfEVHwAyVkLWLWccQTmkQyQKK5FMd54M7HbkCm VpM5jGq6g49nXuPXhI/1HtpaAGHfE0XsPz6KMAMFo4UezYq0cQWeZSwLoJNQCNjAQpHi E7vS9Zg9FPqRmcthkhWSBrlHqjZ8r5TGbHe3COPPsJtXHSBqwqBgVT/lwuz/jzSFI2DX gRWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dhduOngoknWAcZNhOZt0He0Xd0HaNZqrLvZ5hXcwrBqruKB1K DdV0qI1T3W6gj3r4tWMfppNCrncfc5e5Z4eZmXs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzS9+I1p7IF4atg1s0yreazzXqJKKolPvy0H/gggegv33x5MTi45CieBxiv7EamnojdR2iSX/rS30L8QGLvCgg=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8a10:: with SMTP id w16mr46526444iod.170.1594389087627; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 06:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALx6S37Qu_Gj166u5mS4=EDrGr-xSpjYhsFOopGrWcNRSHY7jA@mail.gmail.com> <9eb04806-ba2f-51c9-4937-a38c310796e0@ninetiles.com>
In-Reply-To: <9eb04806-ba2f-51c9-4937-a38c310796e0@ninetiles.com>
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 06:51:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGQg3RpmT9HAKuEb3GFatrtPSO5Fht0sXjZYqrsu8FhKXQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Grant <j@ninetiles.com>
Cc: 5gangip@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000033afcb05aa16a3be"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/5gangip/Oj-N5ZwNxF6ZYy5BOLYco5LpiK8>
Subject: Re: [5gangip] Network tokens draft
X-BeenThere: 5gangip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of implications of the upcoming 5th Generation \(fixed and\) Mobile communication systems on IP protocols." <5gangip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/5gangip>, <mailto:5gangip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/5gangip/>
List-Post: <mailto:5gangip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:5gangip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/5gangip>, <mailto:5gangip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:51:30 -0000

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 5:10 AM John Grant <j@ninetiles.com> wrote:

> This adds even more per-packet processing and makes headers even bigger.
> In ETSI ISG NIN https://www.etsi.org/technologies/non-ip-networking
> we're working on reducing them, as mobile operators (and no doubt
> others) want, by getting all this information into the control plane
> where it belongs.
>

I would be careful saying what operators wants.

I have never heard an operator say that, and i am a mobile operator

But it is no surprise that someone attempting to replace ip is engaged in
puffery ....

CB



> --
> John Grant
> Nine Tiles, Cambridge, England
> +44 1223 862599 and +44 1223 511455
> http://www.ninetiles.com
>
>
> On 09/07/2020 18:00, Tom Herbert wrote:
> > This is a draft on "Network Tokens" which is of relevance to
> > facilitate fine grained QoS in 5G networks.
> >
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yiakoumis-network-tokens-01
> >
> > There is also a mailing list in
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/network-tokens
> >
> > We are planning to present in tsvwg and app aware networking and
> > possibly have a side meeting on this topic in IETF108.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tom
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > 5gangip mailing list
> > 5gangip@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/5gangip
>
> _______________________________________________
> 5gangip mailing list
> 5gangip@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/5gangip
>