Re: [5gangip] Feedback on draft-xyzy-atick-gaps-00

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Thu, 07 June 2018 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A2A130F21 for <5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 07:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b6hOa25m3A4S for <5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 07:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x234.google.com (mail-wr0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CEDD12426A for <5gangip@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 07:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x234.google.com with SMTP id a12-v6so10153191wro.1 for <5gangip@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 07:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=cIV/xAkg9KPS4NNw3S7jdgLovNqQ1HZECmG5SW50JSE=; b=jfi2uBJI9dHUKfcc4Xsq4h9uKlBodwXU+rjGN7nkU1+nwl16ibBGa5Z2x0JXlWJoaf 2gKQAxQguv03Euy3gRjnFLxDFVp++P4NpLVeci0p15bRYO2HA+8G4jU4xXmYil4/h2WZ qv5CfJJp/z6RVEvpHHbKGKWHvGf0KUHEY+zfguuUHLloAkZAcGMIgK5jfNP9rdFdad02 Gi59KN6fSGSH5XejBObYnlZRbVkeQDB4Vb9/lEauoNsvQ6tzPu5TxnlRKzUe+AGiTGYy GzHvZDz9BN937H7n0PVH7gB6uzrK5c9uvZ08+IdKXVpcqpqqP+ewDobSnvrjPVF7s5e3 MvQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cIV/xAkg9KPS4NNw3S7jdgLovNqQ1HZECmG5SW50JSE=; b=nm5aiNi05aFVOAUh70WdMvWvBpRCY/dMFCxSUvzsJDp3Wd9PRZNL4zloxVxdwlz2UD B3uOT4CucMOE+8jqIllhgl+rJ4mZffuGF/n0Q+wHuza6pJibtT4YqxkEfwTCZKk6FuYS 5s9TZcrJEx2zn5AJKuyXVtiCmLCX2bgcyTTVvCAhxRnJsq4IXnJal1flP6Bp487p7sBE /ypRTHdc/TLkBy9U6+AQaEOaO7PzaRzzYTM02QN8noi8wz0fI+s/MuSnCrZTzfoXvY4G v42nIyuI6Nz5R4JXf3odJCvQ1YBSExW7KXuvSbi5bmaoX9Hx3N+PpK/RFVDddywXNowP Ibew==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E24kO41kTHbrujCGr19Q9k9Y+K2uHKcDsi/X+v6dE1pZ5/A2g8J Gx+lsCT3uf6ol/26izl9JcXA+OoWy3MS5T9VcAc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJdgdyZk5/qQneRLo52+aoxd015ENbg9n+qemD7WWk74H+z6snchsC2HCWrhg+/1uDYbV+GArBlGrSBdOzIXz0=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:9724:: with SMTP id r33-v6mr2091977wrb.79.1528382596031; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 07:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:adf:fc84:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 07:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S36iOtho-+cPUUPChrKjvyG-ymOjomPo56w8O42BH+XJBQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALx6S36iOtho-+cPUUPChrKjvyG-ymOjomPo56w8O42BH+XJBQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 09:43:15 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcfObV=c2CHHBWt=Qo9m-NEgtY23wbQE-Pz027LSvig5Hg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Cc: 5GANGIP <5gangip@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b7a72c056e0e4dc9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/5gangip/ks63amjmk7kywiZbEYxPQDcI57E>
Subject: Re: [5gangip] Feedback on draft-xyzy-atick-gaps-00
X-BeenThere: 5gangip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of implications of the upcoming 5th Generation \(fixed and\) Mobile communication systems on IP protocols." <5gangip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/5gangip>, <mailto:5gangip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/5gangip/>
List-Post: <mailto:5gangip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:5gangip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/5gangip>, <mailto:5gangip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 14:43:20 -0000

Hi Tom,


On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> wrote:

> As in previous versions, I think this one jumps into talking about
> specific solutions too quickly before articulating the problem. I
> would make section 3 either be "Problem statement" or "Requirements".
> In either case, the text should be generic for any solutions. For
> example, some requirements might look like:
>
>


> * A mapping system is needed to map identifier to locator
> * Access to the mapping system must done only by authorized entities.
> * Mapping system must mitigate DOS attack
> * IP addresses should not expose specific geo-location of users.
>
>
Thanks a lot for identifying these requirements.
We need a requirements document and the above is a very good starting point.

Regards,
Behcet

> etc...
>
> Once the problem or requirments are laid out, then it makes sense to
> talk about the specific solutions (should be section 4 in my model),
> how they try to address the problems and what their shortcomings are.
>
> I like the idea of section "General recommendations". This would be
> section 5 in the model I'm describing, but I suspect this is not
> complete. It should be driven to satisfy the requirements or solve the
> problem specified in the earlier section. Drawing parts from the
> specific solutions makes sense.
>
> Tom
>
> _______________________________________________
> 5gangip mailing list
> 5gangip@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/5gangip
>