IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [5gangip] New Version Notification for draft-xyzy-atick-gaps-00.txt

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Fri, 08 June 2018 22:38 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6E4130DC2 for <5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 15:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uWm9DQGMtkal for <5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 15:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl0-x22d.google.com (mail-pl0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD0C3130DC1 for <5gangip@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 15:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id g20-v6so9058796plq.1 for <5gangip@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 15:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=eLyx1/6Vci1WhN3FcURywdifaniQTb1zlRYVSmtO6LQ=; b=dewuJPzQw1wo1EQxggMS4Jrq6OxheHRSviHvMCUJWBR/OoTr8HVtqAOS/Y8sk6aq1v qO/kLf/y1EyxHt66g7ygyqrm2amTLEyZc00FhwJMW/LItpRzOaYVIS1bgxCj5exiLVjE 3oCA25itHjofOCzt0p9KhayKFitaN0JnEaE1URKV7aDvSB7neumTddzhOi/hENmXpEAR +25uti6heoKJ+Jwx59TnKcOil2y1PnrXR+T6uKBjis2aU9j/MIPjIfpQQ452P/Rq6etY P/axqQeB2aAfOUP0wnksvfGGigOEB1iSm7PJB5/iTG2REqwarY6IjOR4sotGaLBpLOsj 37NQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=eLyx1/6Vci1WhN3FcURywdifaniQTb1zlRYVSmtO6LQ=; b=bbjwmH2Bqlh9SCMhMCjySjl3XzkYd0rkBeiz/ROVsueoiWWvHN9s+kuwP/Oo+Oz6ak 8U+bWcFrA4CGuQOFgZeB3HB+8yZp/JPkYsglzar0owmCgN5zacYe0dI1GtzQZ/igQPLg ZFbIMvbTi58yAwqSHqI7ELD6aCjay8QGO5UofpfaYZ5RQKvK49r8lYDliHaNZ5/jxDLP KBzkVFYxbL8Nl5AT62nYuznleqiEJIH0q1TiXChIC1FLjC+ZObuHPMJjxLRwkXpBvZZB WBO0idq74g+l/vmr/Bp/DWT8JVsfduc98UHQrzKTP/+DkDll5Rovqt2yIAvaA2xgYgYz yQAg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0wuDNVUBHNxXTk7FwjoIJea3x5/FERM9+zV/++KFWKYxSOaiL1 RrKPrtdbNGEdxieOTQb0fxc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJxSc5rHTVCeGyYiOC91BR6M4XZ8c/CAYTUM5nJ5uhdhsRAA4l3b1oJoWeuWPg7RAqFOGKv3Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:1703:: with SMTP id i3-v6mr8392134pli.263.1528497513553; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 15:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2603:3024:151c:55f0:fc09:414c:743:985? ([2603:3024:151c:55f0:fc09:414c:743:985]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r5-v6sm74252097pgp.81.2018.06.08.15.38.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Jun 2018 15:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S36HxS3EU-bD6QOefM7GQPdLgNmh8wbCr=Psg--MqQTjug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 15:38:27 -0700
Cc: "FIGURELLE, TERRY F" <tf2934@att.com>, Tom Herbert <tom@quantonium.net>, Rex Buddenberg <buddenbergr@gmail.com>, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, 5GANGIP <5gangip@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A68976FC-E835-4300-A2C2-9F40EC14B4FD@gmail.com>
References: <CAC8QAcfuk6e+JPuKC4sw=FPYSgO3Tkr5mjSRJeOzvjxUSc9xFw@mail.gmail.com> <B300114A-8838-4FE2-8FA9-95BA4CD07089@st-andrews.ac.uk> <C42C02FB-4452-4D4F-A826-F24D401BB76D@gigix.net> <1AFE10CF28AE8B4C9663445736B8034D3826A13C@CAFRFD1MSGUSRJI.ITServices.sbc.com> <F5E27567-7D26-4C10-9327-AF7A6FA3712B@gigix.net> <CALx6S356aAYm5Qp75t+SnB=vRKJYcZiktfZD32n92AjwoW7OWA@mail.gmail.com> <1AFE10CF28AE8B4C9663445736B8034D3826B279@CAFRFD1MSGUSRJI.ITServices.sbc.com> <523BE304-3160-4AB8-BACD-245472382320@gmail.com> <1AFE10CF28AE8B4C9663445736B8034D3826B4D5@CAFRFD1MSGUSRJI.ITServices.sbc.com> <C6C5B0AE-3498-4612-9A24-17BCCD9AC930@gmail.com> <1528414247.2315.235.camel@gmail.com> <1AFE10CF28AE8B4C9663445736B8034D3826B8A3@CAFRFD1MSGUSRJI.ITServices.sbc.com> <94DD51FC-3550-4233-BB8C-CC37161ECF0D@gmail.com> <CAPDqMer17WA+rbzWOXxV-E-0G0h38J=MPMCfDYjvS5-mJZgNFw@mail.gmail.com> <18C4E8AC-6CA0-4247-AB9D-27B8F1237FDD@gmail.com> <CE9F21E7-5991-4897-BA58-E564BBBD0C0F@att.com> <CALx6S36HxS3EU-bD6QOefM7GQPdLgNmh8wbCr=Psg--MqQTjug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/5gangip/x2ybeT-TODEy81Oon5koX-AvY7Q>
Subject: Re: [5gangip] New Version Notification for draft-xyzy-atick-gaps-00.txt
X-BeenThere: 5gangip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of implications of the upcoming 5th Generation \(fixed and\) Mobile communication systems on IP protocols." <5gangip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/5gangip>, <mailto:5gangip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/5gangip/>
List-Post: <mailto:5gangip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:5gangip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/5gangip>, <mailto:5gangip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 22:38:35 -0000

> That's interesting. I would assume that the typical fragmentation pattern in the tunneling MTU scenario is precisely two fragments. I believe this is usually one big fragment followed by one small one. 

My implementation fragments into two equal sizes, so one can avoid fragmentation again further downstream.

And I also have seen jumbo frames that needed to be fragmented into 1500 byte fragments. So I fragment into 6 fragments, not 3.

Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email