IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12:00

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Thu, 23 November 2006 13:11 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GnEMP-00040z-8q; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 08:11:25 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GnEMO-00040u-7F for 67attendees@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 08:11:24 -0500
Received: from [2001:630:d0:f102:230:48ff:fe77:96e] (helo=owl.ecs.soton.ac.uk) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GnEMI-00078w-CC for 67attendees@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 08:11:24 -0500
Received: from goose.ecs.soton.ac.uk (goose.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.68.131]) by owl.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kANDAuK4030626 for <67attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:10:56 GMT
Received: from login.ecs.soton.ac.uk (login.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.68.162]) by goose.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kANDAgRU008508 for <67attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:10:42 GMT
Received: (from tjc@localhost) by login.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) id kANDAdql029893 for 67attendees@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:10:39 GMT
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:10:39 +0000
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: 67attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12:00
Message-ID: <20061123131038.GO21101@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <EE8D912486CB3B40978DC42135F2BF8C88A733@ma02exchtmp01.Cantata.com> <BADDD6BD-EB92-4893-8C62-718AF5A49CAC@multicasttech.com> <A0927308-C51A-4C31-A395-BEDBDF3CFB86@mit.edu> <20061113134147.GF5131@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk> <200611131553.kADFrRlD003385@bright.research.att.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200611131553.kADFrRlD003385@bright.research.att.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Null-Tag: 902c6ad05b54584fea94ff802ef5f012
X-Null-Tag: 59e6295ba0fb8e09e3609c40039e23a8
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-Spam-Status: No
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32
X-BeenThere: 67attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 67 Attendess <67attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/67attendees>, <mailto:67attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/67attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:67attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:67attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/67attendees>, <mailto:67attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 67attendees-bounces@ietf.org

On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 07:53:27AM -0800, Bill Fenner wrote:
> 
> >Any charts of volumes of use? :)
> 
> Yes, I have an rrd file with data of "total b/g" and "total a"
> users over the week (actually one for 65 and one for 67).  The
> server it's on is currently in shipment but maybe if you remind
> me next week I can dig up a graph or two...

Hi Bill, if you do have the data available in any form, it would be interesting
to see the comparison.
 
> >I loved the analysis paper done for the network a couple of years ago;
> >any more documentation/discussion like that is very welcome.
> 
> Got a pointer?  I don't remember this and would be interested
> to see.
> 
> Thanks,
>   Bill

-- 
Tim



_______________________________________________
67ATTENDEES mailing list
67ATTENDEES@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/67attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email