Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12:00
Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Mon, 13 November 2006 15:59 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GjeDk-0000ij-P3; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:59:40 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GjeDj-0000bV-Sx for 67attendees@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:59:39 -0500
Received: from [2001:630:d0:f102:230:48ff:fe77:96e] (helo=owl.ecs.soton.ac.uk) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GjeDe-00061N-DF for 67attendees@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:59:39 -0500
Received: from goose.ecs.soton.ac.uk (goose.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.68.131]) by owl.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kADFxIWG014867 for <67attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:59:18 GMT
Received: from login.ecs.soton.ac.uk (login.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.68.162]) by goose.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kADFx4Cb032184 for <67attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:59:04 GMT
Received: (from tjc@localhost) by login.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) id kADFx1jT010452 for 67attendees@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:59:01 GMT
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:59:01 +0000
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: 67attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12:00
Message-ID: <20061113155900.GD5131@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <EE8D912486CB3B40978DC42135F2BF8C88A733@ma02exchtmp01.Cantata.com> <BADDD6BD-EB92-4893-8C62-718AF5A49CAC@multicasttech.com> <A0927308-C51A-4C31-A395-BEDBDF3CFB86@mit.edu> <20061113134147.GF5131@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk> <200611131553.kADFrRlD003385@bright.research.att.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200611131553.kADFrRlD003385@bright.research.att.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Null-Tag: 192d1f3c1e115e4a9e8bd463cd3e75b7
X-Null-Tag: e524d3fc8d4ad936b1ea0035aa44eaf9
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-Spam-Status: No
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22
X-BeenThere: 67attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 67 Attendess <67attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/67attendees>, <mailto:67attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/67attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:67attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:67attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/67attendees>, <mailto:67attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 67attendees-bounces@ietf.org
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 07:53:27AM -0800, Bill Fenner wrote: > > >Any charts of volumes of use? :) > > Yes, I have an rrd file with data of "total b/g" and "total a" > users over the week (actually one for 65 and one for 67). The > server it's on is currently in shipment but maybe if you remind > me next week I can dig up a graph or two... > > >I loved the analysis paper done for the network a couple of years ago; > >any more documentation/discussion like that is very welcome. > > Got a pointer? I don't remember this and would be interested > to see. I may have a PDF somewhere, but my paper copy is: "IEEE 802.11 in the Large: Observations at an IETF Meeting" Andrea G. Forte, Sangho Shin, Henning Schulzrinne It's actually IETF65 data, thought it was older. They focus on one room, and had some interesting views on unecessary handoffs and overheads on those, amongst other things. No mention of canoes ;) -- Tim _______________________________________________ 67ATTENDEES mailing list 67ATTENDEES@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/67attendees
- [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12:00 Jim Martin
- [67ATTENDEES] Re: IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Tim Chown
- [67ATTENDEES] Re: IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Burger, Eric
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] Re: IETF 67 Network goes down a… Joerg Ott
- RE: [67ATTENDEES] Re: IETF 67 Network goes down a… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] Re: IETF 67 Network goes down a… Krzysztof Rzecki
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Ken Raeburn
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Tim Chown
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Bill Fenner
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Tim Chown
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Richard Barnes
- Re(2): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at… Peter Lovell
- Re: Re(2): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes dow… Jim Martin
- Re(4): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at… Peter Lovell
- Re: Re(4): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes dow… Tim Chown
- Re: Re(4): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes dow… Fred Baker
- Re: Re(4): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes dow… Markus Stenberg
- RE: Re(4): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes dow… Tom Alexander
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
- Re(4): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at… Tim Thome
- Re: Re(4): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes dow… Simon Leinen
- Re: Re(4): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes dow… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Re(2): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes dow… Stephen Casner
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Tim Chown