Re: Re(4): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12:00

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Tue, 14 November 2006 12:19 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GjxGN-0002Zt-DE; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:19:39 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GjxGL-0002Zm-1C for 67attendees@ietf.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:19:37 -0500
Received: from [2001:630:d0:f102:230:48ff:fe77:96e] (helo=owl.ecs.soton.ac.uk) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GjxGF-0001jA-LK for 67attendees@ietf.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:19:37 -0500
Received: from goose.ecs.soton.ac.uk (goose.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.68.131]) by owl.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kAECJQnC030685 for <67attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:19:26 GMT
Received: from login.ecs.soton.ac.uk (login.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.68.162]) by goose.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kAECJEtV007902 for <67attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:19:14 GMT
Received: (from tjc@localhost) by login.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) id kAECJBMq008943 for 67attendees@ietf.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:19:11 GMT
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:19:11 +0000
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: 67attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Re(4): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12:00
Message-ID: <20061114121911.GE8091@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <EE8D912486CB3B40978DC42135F2BF8C88A733@ma02exchtmp01.Cantata.com> <BADDD6BD-EB92-4893-8C62-718AF5A49CAC@multicasttech.com> <A0927308-C51A-4C31-A395-BEDBDF3CFB86@mit.edu> <20061113134147.GF5131@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk> <20061113221430.453823151@127.0.0.1> <147DAF3B-F6F1-4044-93DA-3A294A93422D@daedelus.com> <20061113231441.1947189493@127.0.0.1>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20061113231441.1947189493@127.0.0.1>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Null-Tag: 9572541b4f0fdf8bd4b116694a9c5d42
X-Null-Tag: bcad0b3e89c97fdd4bea4375c8a1cfe5
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-Spam-Status: No
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464
X-BeenThere: 67attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 67 Attendess <67attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/67attendees>, <mailto:67attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/67attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:67attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:67attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/67attendees>, <mailto:67attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 67attendees-bounces@ietf.org

On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 06:14:41PM -0500, Peter Lovell wrote:
> >
> >On Nov 13, 2006, at 2:14 PM, Peter Lovell wrote:
> >
> >	Alas, this seems to have been a short-lived win. Indeed all the Core  
> >Duo MacBooks and MacBook Pros have an Atheros A/B/G card, but the OS  
> >doesn't support selecting A over B/G, unless you have A only (or B/G  
> >only) SSIDs. This is why we had the ietf67a and ietf67b SSIDs for the  
> >specific technologies.
> >
> >	Unfortunately, with the release of the new Core 2 Duo based units,  
> >Apple switched from A/B/G to B/G/pre-N. This makes sense, since that  
> >keeps all their technologies at 2.4G (one antenna), and fits with  
> >Steve's clearly stated belief that 802.11a isn't relevant. The bummer  
> >is that 802.11a is much more suited to high density, high demand/ 
> >performance "enterprise" networks like the IETF.
> 
> That's exactly what I do have. And thanks to the excellent instructions
> I did select "a", as (this being new) I wouldn't have recognized the
> difference otherwise.

I have an older Mac and a newer Thinkpad.  The Thinkpad supports a/b/g,
and while the interface for media selection is rather clunky, it does
work very well.    

Is there any feeling for what IETF events will support in the future?
I hope the 11a/b/g support continues, and you don't listen to Jobs :)

-- 
Tim



_______________________________________________
67ATTENDEES mailing list
67ATTENDEES@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/67attendees