Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: Hilton Prague)

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Mon, 26 March 2007 21:40 UTC

Return-path: <68attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HVwvO-0001GF-Tt; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:40:22 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HVwvN-0001GA-Iv for 68attendees@ietf.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:40:21 -0400
Received: from [2001:1af8:2:5::2] (helo=sequoia.muada.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HVwvM-000488-QP for 68attendees@ietf.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:40:21 -0400
Received: from [IPv6:2001:1af8:6::20a:95ff:fef5:246e] (alumange.muada.com [IPv6:2001:1af8:6:0:20a:95ff:fef5:246e]) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l2QLdbPP063483 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Mar 2007 23:39:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
In-Reply-To: <11720.1174923620.530854@peirce.dave.cridland.net>
References: <1073AF4F19F15C4CB635E21CAE2FE67F0194FB@emailhk1.jnpr.net> <12647.1174917975@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca> <11720.1174923620.530854@peirce.dave.cridland.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <A39393BA-6F1F-491A-A6CC-E4F2FC313DD6@muada.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Subject: Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: Hilton Prague)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 23:39:35 +0200
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on sequoia.muada.com
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Cc: "Mailing list for IETF 68 attendees." <68attendees@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: 68attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for IETF 68 attendees." <68attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees>, <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/68attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:68attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees>, <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 68attendees-bounces@ietf.org

On 26-mrt-2007, at 18:40, Dave Cridland wrote:

> Where we find a venue that is, in terms of unfixable problems,  
> good, then we should repeat it, even if the initial meeting found  
> fixable problems high.

Since this discussion stubbornly refuses to die, I might as well  
chime in.

Fixable: the floor plans on the agenda leaflet were largely  
unreadable with online floor maps hard to find, which made finding  
some of the less used meeting rooms MUCH harder than it needed to be.  
Although there were more than enough refreshments in the afternoons,  
no water around before that.

(Presumably) non-fixable: the smaller rooms were pretty bad: ceiling  
too low to allow for decent projection, bad acoustics and for the idr  
wg we even had one with big fat columns in the middle.

But a factor 12 closer to home than San Diego and a 30 second  
immigration queue isn't half bad.  :-)

_______________________________________________
68ATTENDEES mailing list
68ATTENDEES@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees