Re: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine
Randall Gellens <randy@qualcomm.com> Tue, 27 March 2007 16:15 UTC
Return-path: <68attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWEK9-0005Ar-LM; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:15:05 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWEK8-0005Af-3o for 68attendees@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:15:04 -0400
Received: from ithilien.qualcomm.com ([129.46.51.59]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWEK6-0007rp-Oq for 68attendees@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:15:04 -0400
Received: from neophyte.qualcomm.com (neophyte.qualcomm.com [129.46.61.149]) by ithilien.qualcomm.com (8.13.6/8.12.5/1.0) with ESMTP id l2RGF1Dx010595 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:15:01 -0700
Received: from [[192.168.1.13]] (vpn-10-50-0-59.qualcomm.com [10.50.0.59]) by neophyte.qualcomm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/1.0) with ESMTP id l2RGF0Dq013496; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:15:00 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240606c22ef172db75@[[192.168.1.13]]>
In-Reply-To: <20070326164419.GB25751@Sun.COM>
References: <460692B6.70603@andybierman.com> <BA477D52-B39E-4F11-AD3E-7EC57CEAC11B@cisco.com> <20070326164419.GB25751@Sun.COM>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
X-message-flag: Warning: Outlook in use. Upgrade to Eudora: <http://www.eudora.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:13:24 -0700
To: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
From: Randall Gellens <randy@qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e5ba305d0e64821bf3d8bc5d3bb07228
Cc: 68attendees@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: 68attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for IETF 68 attendees." <68attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees>, <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/68attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:68attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees>, <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 68attendees-bounces@ietf.org
At 11:44 AM -0500 3/26/07, Nicolas Williams wrote: > Current demographics shouldn't be weighed too heavily as IETF meetings > might help stimulate broader participation from locals. I have to disagree. I think Fred is correct on this point: we should aim for holding meetings that are near the people who are currently doing the work. There are a number of standards bodies that do the bulk of their work in the meetings. The IETF isn't like that -- it is possible to do a fair bit of work on the mailing lists. Encouraging new people and people in new areas to start working in the IETF is a good thing, but should be done using tools other than the location of the IETF meetings themselves. Meeting time is too limited to spend it this way. Most groups meet for two hours, and that time needs to be focused; people need to be familiar with the issues before they walk into the meeting room. > And as you point out hotel options matter. Many of us work late hours > during IETF meetings, so being able to stay at the conference hotel > matters I agree. Plus running into people in the lobby or other areas helps a lot, as a lot of the IETF work gets done in informal meetings. -- Randall Gellens Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only -------------- Randomly-selected tag: --------------- Democracy is a form of government in which it is permitted to wonder aloud what the country could do under first-class management. _______________________________________________ 68ATTENDEES mailing list 68ATTENDEES@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees
- [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Andy Bierman
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Antoin Verschuren
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Andy Bierman
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Derek Atkins
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Fred Baker
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Nicolas Williams
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Andy Bierman
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Eric Gray (LO/EUS)
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Stewart Bryant
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Eric Gray (LO/EUS)
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Eric Gray (LO/EUS)
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Nicolas Williams
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Eric Gray (LO/EUS)
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Nicolas Williams
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine John C Klensin
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Lou Berger
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Avri Doria
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Lots of hotels Re: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness … Janet P Gunn
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Randall Gellens
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Andy Bierman
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine Michael Richardson