Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: Hilton Prague)

"Andrew G. Malis" <> Sun, 25 March 2007 14:01 UTC

Return-path: <>
Received: from [] ( by with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HVTHi-0005Pq-Pz; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:01:26 -0400
Received: from [] ( by with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HVTHh-0005JV-4x for; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:01:25 -0400
Received: from ([]) by with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HVTHe-0000Gz-Pd for; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:01:25 -0400
Received: by with SMTP id d30so1815840and for <>; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 07:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=qSof6nEPXkMSBVcNXGFFBk/SGWAEGlFFzWZ7BIiL7nw+3vzXgRGiqyfvbLHd83LG0cpnvjfjzt9xxeDTSZHl488ydZrdX1kojacqQFkiC4tpeOxasPzUjFZBvbv4eD4lUzVmSGomTXUjqu5eBqRu5YYIM5IWWHa/RGFs7tppkfc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=omWsdyEyh27ZRzdzfiT9SUzoIf5bX+7TjegsNEdpjceupROrXbHcOTusfMaYtNuSvo5MNXeMctTN4Kcg+66uaz8ZdCTuBtA39NCpU/cPw0Yy9wMngwTj0mZ1RGfXdxd3K932iz0IvWjT9FC4uKnPG+DfwFyfY3t7HC8dKb/NFbI=
Received: by with SMTP id e2mr4159420ane.1174831282222; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 07:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with HTTP; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 07:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:01:22 -0400
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <>
To: "Scott W Brim" <>
Subject: Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: Hilton Prague)
In-Reply-To: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <E494099B5ACEC25B26C1BD5C@> <>
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 538aad3a3c4f01d8b6a6477ca4248793
Cc: John C Klensin <>,
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for IETF 68 attendees." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1446948131=="

I don't recall seeing all of these complaints about smoke at the London and
Paris meetings, which to my memory were much smokier environments, both
inside and outside the hotel. Personally, I really enjoyed
Prague and the hotel and would be happy to return (this was my third time in
Prague and my second time at this hotel). I'm sorry that a few individuals
had strong allergic reactions, but I doubt that we
could meet most anywhere outside of North America without that being a problem.


On 3/25/07, Scott W Brim <> wrote:
> The air quality in some of the main meeting rooms was the *only*
> problem I saw with Prague.  Yes there was smoke leakage but that's
> true everywhere outside of the USA.  Oh, also my room telephone only
> rang in the bathroom.  I told the hotel staff it was a fantastic
> conference facility in a great city and I would be happy to come back
> any time.  I'm sure they can fix that if we tell them it's the only
> drawback to "the new Minneapolis".
> Scott
> p.s. In 1990, Alan Levy, Editor in Chief of The Prague Post,
> proclaimed that Prague was the "Left Bank of the 90s," the new
> European haven for American artists.  Now it's "the new Minneapolis of
> the 10s".
> _______________________________________________
> 68ATTENDEES mailing list
68ATTENDEES mailing list