Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: Hilton Prague)
"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Sun, 25 March 2007 14:01 UTC
Return-path: <68attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HVTHi-0005Pq-Pz; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:01:26 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HVTHh-0005JV-4x for 68attendees@ietf.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:01:25 -0400
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.251]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HVTHe-0000Gz-Pd for 68attendees@ietf.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:01:25 -0400
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d30so1815840and for <68attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 07:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=qSof6nEPXkMSBVcNXGFFBk/SGWAEGlFFzWZ7BIiL7nw+3vzXgRGiqyfvbLHd83LG0cpnvjfjzt9xxeDTSZHl488ydZrdX1kojacqQFkiC4tpeOxasPzUjFZBvbv4eD4lUzVmSGomTXUjqu5eBqRu5YYIM5IWWHa/RGFs7tppkfc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=omWsdyEyh27ZRzdzfiT9SUzoIf5bX+7TjegsNEdpjceupROrXbHcOTusfMaYtNuSvo5MNXeMctTN4Kcg+66uaz8ZdCTuBtA39NCpU/cPw0Yy9wMngwTj0mZ1RGfXdxd3K932iz0IvWjT9FC4uKnPG+DfwFyfY3t7HC8dKb/NFbI=
Received: by 10.100.31.2 with SMTP id e2mr4159420ane.1174831282222; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 07:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.250.20 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 07:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <8c99930d0703250701x710bc52cqc61fe9198844995e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:01:22 -0400
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
To: Scott W Brim <swb@employees.org>
Subject: Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: Hilton Prague)
In-Reply-To: <4606739E.50105@employees.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <E494099B5ACEC25B26C1BD5C@10.5.0.28> <4606739E.50105@employees.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 538aad3a3c4f01d8b6a6477ca4248793
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, 68attendees@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: 68attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for IETF 68 attendees." <68attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees>, <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/68attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:68attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees>, <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1446948131=="
Errors-To: 68attendees-bounces@ietf.org
I don't recall seeing all of these complaints about smoke at the London and Paris meetings, which to my memory were much smokier environments, both inside and outside the hotel. Personally, I really enjoyed Prague and the hotel and would be happy to return (this was my third time in Prague and my second time at this hotel). I'm sorry that a few individuals had strong allergic reactions, but I doubt that we could meet most anywhere outside of North America without that being a problem. Cheers, Andy On 3/25/07, Scott W Brim <swb@employees.org> wrote: > > The air quality in some of the main meeting rooms was the *only* > problem I saw with Prague. Yes there was smoke leakage but that's > true everywhere outside of the USA. Oh, also my room telephone only > rang in the bathroom. I told the hotel staff it was a fantastic > conference facility in a great city and I would be happy to come back > any time. I'm sure they can fix that if we tell them it's the only > drawback to "the new Minneapolis". > > Scott > > p.s. In 1990, Alan Levy, Editor in Chief of The Prague Post, > proclaimed that Prague was the "Left Bank of the 90s," the new > European haven for American artists. Now it's "the new Minneapolis of > the 10s". > > _______________________________________________ > 68ATTENDEES mailing list > 68ATTENDEES@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees >
_______________________________________________ 68ATTENDEES mailing list 68ATTENDEES@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees
- [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: Hilto… John C Klensin
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Espoo)
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Aaron Stone
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Randall Gellens
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Fred Baker
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Nemeth Krisztian
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… John C Klensin
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… John C Klensin
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Fred Baker
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Ole Jacobsen
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Yaakov Stein
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Sasha Vainshtein
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Peter Tomsu
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Scott W Brim
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague Doug Montgomery
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Mark Williams
- Re: [***SPAM*** Score/Req: 10.4/4.5] Re: [68ATTEN… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague Avri Doria
- [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (Prague Marriot… Natale, Bob
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Robert Loomans
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Michael Richardson
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Dave Cridland
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Smoke at Meetings was Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning… Ray Pelletier
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Bill Fenner
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… John C Klensin
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Ray Pelletier
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague Tony Hansen
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Drage, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Eliot Lear
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Pekka Savola
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] IETF tools Tim Chown
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Jim Martin
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Avri Doria
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Ray Pelletier
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Janet P Gunn
- Floor plan Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague … Janet P Gunn
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Randall Gellens
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Randall Gellens
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Randall Gellens
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Randall Gellens
- Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Pra… Nicolas Williams
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Michael Richardson
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Randall Gellens
- Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… John C Klensin
- Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… YAO Jiankang
- Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… Nicolas Williams
- [68ATTENDEES] Moving ahead with tools.ietf.org Pekka Savola
- Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… John C Klensin
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Moving ahead with tools.ietf.org Aaron Stone
- [68ATTENDEES] Maybe we should be talking on the I… Spencer at Yahoo
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Maybe we should be talking on t… Yaakov Stein
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Moving ahead with tools.ietf.org Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Moving ahead with tools.ietf.org Sandra Murphy
- Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Moving ahead with tools.ietf.org Aaron Stone
- Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… John C Klensin
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Moving ahead with tools.ietf.org Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… Michael Richardson
- Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… Keith Kyzivat
- Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… Nicolas Williams
- Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… Dean Willis
- RE: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… hannu.hietalahti