Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: Hilton Prague)

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Wed, 28 March 2007 19:09 UTC

Return-path: <68attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWdW7-00080W-13; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:09:07 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWdW5-0007xV-1f for 68attendees@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:09:05 -0400
Received: from ns.jck.com ([209.187.148.211] helo=bs.jck.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWdUN-0000c1-ID for 68attendees@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:07:20 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1HWdUN-000Iy3-Bq; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:07:19 -0500
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:07:19 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Subject: Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: Hilton Prague)
Message-ID: <6031511F2CBF662C7B4201A5@P5.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <A40F19B0-50D3-40D3-B1A6-E2CEAC1E86D6@muada.com>
References: <1073AF4F19F15C4CB635E21CAE2FE67F0194FB@emailhk1.jnpr.net> <12647.1174917975@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca> <11720.1174923620.530854@peirce.dave.cridland.net> <20070327165356.GN25751@Sun.COM> <3BA2633F39FF5716E9E41F53@p3.JCK.COM> <20070328034725.GB1666@Sun.COM> <106ECCEC9A78396EA060E382@P5.jck.com> <A40F19B0-50D3-40D3-B1A6-E2CEAC1E86D6@muada.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
Cc: "Mailing list for IETF 68 attendees." <68attendees@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: 68attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for IETF 68 attendees." <68attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees>, <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/68attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:68attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees>, <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 68attendees-bounces@ietf.org

At the risk of, once again, being accused of favoring only North American 
meetings (which I have never done), I can't find any way to disagree with 
any of this.

   john


--On Wednesday, March 28, 2007 8:51 PM +0200 Iljitsch van Beijnum 
<iljitsch@muada.com> wrote:

> On 28-mrt-2007, at 19:40, John C Klensin wrote:
>
>> While my preferences run to hot water, preferably flavored with
>> tea, rather than ice water, the answer is the same -- insulated
>> bottles or mugs, refilled at appropriate breaks.  Certainly that is
>> not as convenient as having beverages continually available, which
>> I prefer too, but it works reasonably well as long as beverages are
>> not dispensed by the glass or bottle by meeting site staff who
>> consider each one a valuable resource to be carefully controlled.
>
>> So, again, I consider this a matter of convenience, probably even
>> relatively important convenience, not one of necessity for people
>> (even a subset of people) to attend the meeting.
>
> Well obviously nobody died of dehydration at an IETF meeting that I'm
> aware of, but the problem is that there is no reasonable way to get at
> anything drinkable around the conference rooms between 9 and 15 hours
> under the Prague regime. (And it was a lot worse in Paris, I think they
> even turned off the taps in the bath rooms.) So if, like me, you tend to
> skip lunch because running out, eating in a hurry, and running back is
> either a waste of time or a waste of food (depending on the quality of
> the latter), then this scores very high on the annoyance scale. Being
> able to buy beverages helps a little, but the portions tend to be so
> small at hotel type venues that this isn't much of a solution.
>
> Either have fountains, coolers or big (~500ml) bottles of the stuff. The
> meeting fees have increased by nearly 50% in 10 years and are around
> double what's needed to cover costs. Water sec costs in the order of
> $1/cubic meter (where I'm from at least) so I don't think this is too
> much too ask for.





_______________________________________________
68ATTENDEES mailing list
68ATTENDEES@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees