Re: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine

Andy Bierman wrote:
> IMO, the interval over which fairness is measured has to be longer
> than one year to allow more flexibility for all the meeting logistics
> we already discussed to death.  I would pick 3 years.  (I wonder
> how how we have rated on your 3 continent test over an
> overlapping 9 meeting interval?)

Also keep in mind that sometimes the plan falls through so other plans
need to take over.  For example, Vancouver was a fall-through of a plan
to go to Asia.  Do you olan to take that into account?

> My main point is that it is not just travel budget that is
> being shared unequally by having so many meeting in North America.
> 
> (2 more cents -- as great as Prague was, I would rather stick
> to hub cities like London.)

"Hub Cities" is in the eye of the beholder (or perhaps in the eye of
your preferred airlines).  Prague is a Hub City for me, as is Amsterdam.
Getting to London is no easier for me (assuming I want to stick with my
airlines).

-derek

-- 
Derek Atkins
Principal Software Engineer

PGP Corporation
4 Farragut Ave
Somerville, MA  02144

+1 617 623 3745 | warlord@pgp.com

PGP Corporation -- Rest Secured.(TM)

PGP Fingerprint:
0FEE 5EA1 FF22 E0C9 4FFE
631A 9232 FF93 1C80 1DB7

This email and any attachments thereto may contain private,
confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended
recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any
attachments thereto) by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not
the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and
permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any
attachments thereto.

_______________________________________________
68ATTENDEES mailing list
68ATTENDEES@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees