RE: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine

Stewart,

	I realize that your response to my post may simply be because 
it was convenient, but responding to me along the lines below is not
particularly just - especially when you omit my comment.

	I merely observed that - as long as we're talking about more
variety in meeting venues - it might be worth noting that the IETF
appears to think that the planet Earth is hemispherical.  Perhaps
it might be useful to have a meeting once every few decades in the
part of the world where the Earth spins clockwise.

	Instead, you respond to my post as if I was arguing that the
IETF is really just a social club.  Really?  

	:-)

--
Eric Gray
Principal Engineer
Ericsson  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stbryant@cisco.com] 
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 1:23 PM
> To: Eric Gray (LO/EUS)
> Cc: Andy Bierman; Nicolas Williams; 68attendees@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [68ATTENDEES] Travel Fairness Doctrine
> Importance: High
> 
> I am not sure I subscribe to the travel fairness doctrine.
> 
> For me the ONLY criteria is whether the people that need to be in the 
> meetings and in the corridors to get the work done will be there.
> 
> Everything else is secondary as far as I am concerned.
> 
> Stewart
> 

_______________________________________________
68ATTENDEES mailing list
68ATTENDEES@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees