[68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (Prague Marriott perspective)
"Natale, Bob" <RNATALE@mitre.org> Sun, 25 March 2007 19:00 UTC
Return-path: <68attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HVXxX-0006Xh-60; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:00:55 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HVXxV-0006X3-Jw for 68attendees@ietf.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:00:53 -0400
Received: from smtpproxy2.mitre.org ([192.80.55.71] helo=smtp-mclean.mitre.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HVXxS-0006t6-B7 for 68attendees@ietf.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:00:53 -0400
Received: from smtp-mclean.mitre.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-mclean.mitre.org (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id l2PJ0kUO003274 for <68attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:00:48 -0400
Received: from smtp-mclean.mitre.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-mclean.mitre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF181BD7C for <68attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:00:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imcfe2.MITRE.ORG (imcfe2.mitre.org [129.83.29.4]) by smtp-mclean.mitre.org (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l2PJ0jSW003268 for <68attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:00:45 -0400
Received: from IMCSRV2.MITRE.ORG ([129.83.20.164]) by imcfe2.MITRE.ORG with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:00:45 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:00:45 -0400
Message-ID: <4915F014FDD99049A9C3A8C1B832004F01B278DD@IMCSRV2.MITRE.ORG>
In-Reply-To: <35E59BC5-5FD5-4D79-B39E-314FA35DD425@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Returning to Prague (Prague Marriott perspective)
Thread-Index: AcduoAZzgb8/iq7MQnC762hyMPUVdAAbTOEw
References: <C22B3189.3BF72%Jonne.Soininen@nokia.com><4BF1E72894B84DD9198E34A9@[10.0.0.45]> <35E59BC5-5FD5-4D79-B39E-314FA35DD425@cisco.com>
From: "Natale, Bob" <RNATALE@mitre.org>
To: 68attendees@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Mar 2007 19:00:45.0625 (UTC) FILETIME=[E4BECA90:01C76F0F]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
Subject: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (Prague Marriott perspective)
X-BeenThere: 68attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for IETF 68 attendees." <68attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees>, <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/68attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:68attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees>, <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 68attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, Fred Baker wisely noted: > I observe that for every person with a complaint > there have been two saying they loved it. > I'm listening to those people as well. Include me in the "loved it" group...with a slightly different twist than I've read so far: As it turned out, I registered too late for the Hilton block of rooms at the IETF rate, and ended up in the Prague Marriott. The room rate was somewhat higher (as noted on the IETF web site), but the accommodations were excellent, as was every aspect of staying there (food, services, staff, security, very good wrt non-smoking considerations). The relatively short and brisk walks to and from the Hilton were pleasant and refreshing, even several times a day...and being that much closer to the old town commercial and cultural venues was a definite added bonus. (The Prague Marriott extended the discounted IETF rate to me for the entire duration of my stay -- Sat to Sat -- including high-speed Internet (no glitches whatsoever) and an outstanding full breakfast each day.) The Prague IETF meeting was well worth the cost...and I would definitely return to the Prague Marriott for a vacation in Prague (if I could afford their regular rates...which I doubt). One last thing: While I empathize with Andy's comments about air travel today, I have to say that Air France did a great job for me on this trip (IAD->CDG->PRG and return)...esp. considering the very bad weather conditions at IAD on March 16. The Prague IETF experience was a great one for me, in all respects....and I also love Minneapolis! Cheers, BobN -----Original Message----- From: Fred Baker [mailto:fred@cisco.com] Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 1:40 AM ... I observe that for every person with a complaint there have been two saying they loved it. I'm listening to those people as well. _______________________________________________ 68ATTENDEES mailing list 68ATTENDEES@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees
- [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: Hilto… John C Klensin
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Espoo)
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Aaron Stone
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Randall Gellens
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Fred Baker
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Nemeth Krisztian
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… John C Klensin
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… John C Klensin
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Fred Baker
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Ole Jacobsen
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Yaakov Stein
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Sasha Vainshtein
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Peter Tomsu
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Scott W Brim
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague Doug Montgomery
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Mark Williams
- Re: [***SPAM*** Score/Req: 10.4/4.5] Re: [68ATTEN… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague Avri Doria
- [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (Prague Marriot… Natale, Bob
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Robert Loomans
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Michael Richardson
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Dave Cridland
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Smoke at Meetings was Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning… Ray Pelletier
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Bill Fenner
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… John C Klensin
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Ray Pelletier
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague Tony Hansen
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Drage, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Eliot Lear
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Pekka Savola
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] IETF tools Tim Chown
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Jim Martin
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Avri Doria
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Ray Pelletier
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Janet P Gunn
- Floor plan Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague … Janet P Gunn
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Randall Gellens
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Randall Gellens
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Randall Gellens
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Randall Gellens
- Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Pra… Nicolas Williams
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Michael Richardson
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: H… Randall Gellens
- Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… John C Klensin
- Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… YAO Jiankang
- Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… Nicolas Williams
- [68ATTENDEES] Moving ahead with tools.ietf.org Pekka Savola
- Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… John C Klensin
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Moving ahead with tools.ietf.org Aaron Stone
- [68ATTENDEES] Maybe we should be talking on the I… Spencer at Yahoo
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Maybe we should be talking on t… Yaakov Stein
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Moving ahead with tools.ietf.org Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Moving ahead with tools.ietf.org Sandra Murphy
- Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Moving ahead with tools.ietf.org Aaron Stone
- Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… John C Klensin
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Moving ahead with tools.ietf.org Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… Michael Richardson
- Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… Keith Kyzivat
- Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… Nicolas Williams
- Re: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… Dean Willis
- RE: Water features Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to… hannu.hietalahti