Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: Hilton Prague)

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Sat, 24 March 2007 21:47 UTC

Return-path: <68attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HVE5K-00055t-I7; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:47:38 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HVE5I-00055O-1C for 68attendees@ietf.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:47:36 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HVE5G-0006wc-No for 68attendees@ietf.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:47:36 -0400
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Mar 2007 14:47:34 -0700
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l2OLlY1S031625; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 14:47:34 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l2OLlXEi028701; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 21:47:33 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 24 Mar 2007 14:47:33 -0700
Received: from [10.0.0.119] ([10.21.145.154]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 24 Mar 2007 14:47:32 -0700
In-Reply-To: <1174765470.31407.286.camel@localhost>
References: <C22B3189.3BF72%Jonne.Soininen@nokia.com> <1174765470.31407.286.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <8A1DF290-335E-4024-A1A2-1F6B1DB8A566@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [68ATTENDEES] Returning to Prague (was: Re: Hilton Prague)
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 22:47:28 +0100
To: Aaron Stone <aaron@serendipity.cx>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Mar 2007 21:47:33.0068 (UTC) FILETIME=[073BA8C0:01C76E5E]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=986; t=1174772854; x=1175636854; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[68ATTENDEES]=20Returning=20to=20Prague=20(was=3A=20R e=3A=20Hilton=20Prague) |Sender:=20; bh=drhzneOPIGCyBS2PtiF3KiPT5RHsl5fP8SY26iugBmw=; b=KV1GHKMvRC9zPN9RQFhBRvTDjZ4FgLnieP1CUQZTfYTQ+fIWkk/js/MNXrkQpqTloUCzP3Cl qpQ1gX8EQaeDrf1B7nkTCZwYVNH8SAef8rQySTAK0kxHxZe1UEwbaZUN;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass (si g from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Cc: ext John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, "Soininen Jonne \(Nokia-NET/Espoo\)" <Jonne.Soininen@nokia.com>, 68attendees@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: 68attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for IETF 68 attendees." <68attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees>, <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/68attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:68attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees>, <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 68attendees-bounces@ietf.org

On Mar 24, 2007, at 8:44 PM, Aaron Stone wrote:
> I seems to me that a non-smoking lobby area should simply be one of  
> the many things that are negotiated with the conference venue.  
> There must already be negotiations on which and how many conference  
> rooms, hotel rooms, bringing in Internet access, and so on.
>
> So let's add one more: if the hotel is in a country that allows  
> smoking indoors, the hotel must arrange for a significant non- 
> smoking portion of the lobby to allow free movement of smoke- 
> sensitive participants from the front door to the registration to  
> the conference rooms.

I wonder if you are still in Prague, and if you are, the fact that  
the red "no smoking" signs in the lobby have all been replaced with  
green "smoking" signs?

What, specifically, is your complaint? It looks to me like this is  
exactly what happened. What John is complaining about is that there  
was an area that remained available to smokers.

_______________________________________________
68ATTENDEES mailing list
68ATTENDEES@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees