Re: [69ATTENDEES] hand drums?

Spencer Dawkins <spencer@mcsr-labs.org> Mon, 30 July 2007 11:20 UTC

Return-path: <69attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IFTIZ-00043Y-2L; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 07:20:27 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IFTIY-00043T-77 for 69attendees@ietf.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 07:20:26 -0400
Received: from usaga01-in.huawei.com ([206.16.17.211]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IFTIW-0003Gg-70 for 69attendees@ietf.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 07:20:26 -0400
Received: from huawei.com (usaga01-in [172.18.4.6]) by usaga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JLZ000CIOTZXJ@usaga01-in.huawei.com> for 69attendees@ietf.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from s73602 (cpe-72-190-0-23.tx.res.rr.com [72.190.0.23]) by usaga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JLZ001PHOTVQ4@usaga01-in.huawei.com> for 69attendees@ietf.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 06:17:00 -0500
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
Subject: Re: [69ATTENDEES] hand drums?
To: Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com>, tlr@w3.org
Message-id: <011a01c7d29b$26e95c20$6901a8c0@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
Content-type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="response"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <46A934DA.3000300@neustar.biz> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0707261953360.7230@pita.cisco.com> <1d9401c7d03e$c1560ba0$fb0111ac@china.huawei.com> <200707271106.25882.michael_graff@isc.org> <1ebc01c7d068$34956290$fb0111ac@china.huawei.com> <46AA1BD8.5090407@isoc.org> <00b301c7d16c$560b1af0$6901a8c0@china.huawei.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0707281621120.22000@pita.cisco.com> <46ACD23C.3000301@sri.com> <200707291833.TAA04162@cisco.com> <20070729185056.GE2974@raktajino.does-not-exist.org> <46ADBADE.6020704@cisco.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
Cc: 69attendees@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: 69attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: for attendees at 69th IETF <69attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/69attendees>, <mailto:69attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/69attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:69attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:69attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/69attendees>, <mailto:69attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 69attendees-bounces@ietf.org

With apologies to Jon Postel ...

From: "Paul Aitken" <paitken@cisco.com>


> Thomas Roessler wrote:
>
>>> And bagpipes.
>>
>> I'll take the jackhammer.
>
> Sacrilege!

I think if we agree now to be conservative in what we take to the IETF 
meetings and liberal in what we're willing to listen to once we get there, 
the result may be the best we can achieve in a group of a thousand or so 
people ;-)

Thanks,

Spencer, who promises to back off exponentially if everyone else will, 
too... 



_______________________________________________
69ATTENDEES mailing list
69ATTENDEES@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/69attendees