RE: [69ATTENDEES] spams...
"Arnoud van Wijk" <arnoud@annies.nl> Mon, 13 August 2007 10:39 UTC
Return-path: <69attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IKXKQ-0003Uj-3c; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:39:18 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IKXKO-0003UY-Iu for 69attendees@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:39:16 -0400
Received: from smtp.enternext.com ([81.17.35.9] helo=enternet.nl) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IKXKM-00015G-Ai for 69attendees@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:39:16 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by enternet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9603939AC5F; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:39:21 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Score: 0.005
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.005 tagged_above=-999 required=6.5 tests=[AWL=0.005]
Received: from enternet.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.enternext.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id F+PPdslWu5lH; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:39:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from MainPC (82-197-192-189.dsl.cambrium.nl [82.197.192.189]) by enternet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514FF39A5D4; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:39:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Arnoud van Wijk <arnoud@annies.nl>
To: 'Jaap Akkerhuis' <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>, 69attendees@ietf.org
References: Your message of Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:54:15 +0200. <5DF79733-1F3C-4D1D-B818-5D41EADCCDCF@muada.com> <200708130927.l7D9RFA9068948@bartok.nlnetlabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <200708130927.l7D9RFA9068948@bartok.nlnetlabs.nl>
Subject: RE: [69ATTENDEES] spams...
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:39:22 +0200
Message-ID: <002201c7dd96$3615a6d0$a240f470$@nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcfdjDUjfr7+WtDSSDO5wgu7K2XHdAACaAPw
Content-Language: nl
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
Cc:
X-BeenThere: 69attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: for attendees at 69th IETF <69attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/69attendees>, <mailto:69attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/69attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:69attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:69attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/69attendees>, <mailto:69attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 69attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Sure..let's see... Umm vancouver in december is too cold! :-) I want hawaii...nice and warm. Just kidding. About spam: yes got a few but my filters filtered all except 1 out. If you do not to receive from this mailing list, just send them to deleted items using the rules or filter them. And I am looking forward to meet you all in Vancouver! Arnoud A. T. van Wijk AnnieS http://www.annies.nl/content/inEnglish/home.asp Mobile textphone (SIP): arnoud.vanwijk@annies.nl > -----Original Message----- > From: Jaap Akkerhuis [mailto:jaap@NLnetLabs.nl] > Sent: maandag 13 augustus 2007 11:27 > To: 69attendees@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [69ATTENDEES] spams... > > > people on this list seem to have such a short memory. When subscibing > to this list I was told it would be closed 30 days after the meeting. > Out can see this also on the list announcements > (http://www.ietf.org/PASTMEETINGS/69-mailing_list.html): > > Purpose: for the IAD and IETF Secretariat to send messages > related to the 69th IETF meeting. You can subscribe and unsubscribe > at www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/69attendees. > > This mailing list will expire 30 days after meeting. > > Now, let's whine about something else. > > jaap > > _______________________________________________ > 69ATTENDEES mailing list > 69ATTENDEES@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/69attendees _______________________________________________ 69ATTENDEES mailing list 69ATTENDEES@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/69attendees
- [69ATTENDEES] spams... Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: [69ATTENDEES] spams... Randall Gellens
- Re: [69ATTENDEES] spams... Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: [69ATTENDEES] spams... Janet P Gunn
- RE: [69ATTENDEES] spams... Mary Barnes
- RE: [69ATTENDEES] spams... Cees de Laat
- Re: [69ATTENDEES] spams... Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [69ATTENDEES] spams... Jaap Akkerhuis
- RE: [69ATTENDEES] spams... Arnoud van Wijk
- Re: [69ATTENDEES] spams... rpelletier