Re: [6gip] 6G
John Grant <j@ninetiles.com> Thu, 14 January 2021 12:21 UTC
Return-Path: <j@ninetiles.com>
X-Original-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0583A1490
for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 04:21:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.16
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.16 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id IL_30cBf8p9e for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 14 Jan 2021 04:21:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from know-smtprelay-omc-5.server.virginmedia.net
(know-smtprelay-omc-5.server.virginmedia.net [80.0.253.69])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23D753A141B
for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 04:21:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.167] ([86.7.146.7]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPA
id 01cglalDeSJHJ01cgldiUY; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:21:07 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [86.7.146.7]
X-Authenticated-User: john.s.grant@ntlworld.com
X-Spam: 0
X-Authority: v=2.3 cv=ZJn5Z0zb c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=ETEHsBHxkjOw4DtPg6cH8g==:117
a=ETEHsBHxkjOw4DtPg6cH8g==:17 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=le6d79QuAAAA:8
a=oCcaPWc0AAAA:8 a=Oo0gwvg7wK9jPXFL1LUA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
a=QbAMNLWdp4a7deKPGBBn:22
To: 6gip@ietf.org
References: <HE1PR07MB3386A43B4B32BF2CE5DC48C79BAA0@HE1PR07MB3386.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
<248399ab-7dc1-ee13-928c-751568ea58e5@gmail.com>
<HE1PR07MB3386A19851BFFF1ED5DDECAE9BA90@HE1PR07MB3386.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
<SA0PR13MB40801CE55D18D1EF814ED7CDE8A99@SA0PR13MB4080.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
<86fad3c0-a5b0-f6a5-4671-1802d724c5a5@gmail.com>
<43004FC4-43C2-4B52-99C8-33A9360DEA30@eggert.org>
<9b4112ad-afbc-80b3-427e-61e9c883bebb@gmail.com>
From: John Grant <j@ninetiles.com>
Message-ID: <c80429d2-fd72-b6ce-3604-51a43a2addf3@ninetiles.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:21:06 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9b4112ad-afbc-80b3-427e-61e9c883bebb@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-GB
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 210114-0, 14/01/2021), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfFphil0JO5R06IdJettJM9DbSed4v5B7oAJ4pihiaxoPIxJeuCmRMBCGXqzfkIeZGW+zr5/ElJvIdiaBA/4jYgosuzOPXkOnQwIC8YfRTusXT8U0Qvch
Gro1gcAoE5qwvhAf8JEqDjSCHFASW0NwANI=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6gip/0TWnMIVdFstDEFIT_dSqdSQltQk>
Subject: Re: [6gip] 6G
X-BeenThere: 6gip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Issues in 6th Generation Mobile Network System \(6gip\)"
<6gip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6gip>,
<mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6gip/>
List-Post: <mailto:6gip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6gip>,
<mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:21:13 -0000
On 14/01/2021 11:33, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: > The distance situation of base stations is not an impediment to > achieve high bandwidths. No, but you also wanted 1 microsec latency, which is the time it takes light to go 300 metres. BTW what kind of applications do you think would need latency that low? -- John Grant Nine Tiles, Cambridge, England +44 1223 862599 and +44 1223 511455 http://www.ninetiles.com -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
- [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? - timeline Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Stefan Alfredsson
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? John Grant
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Kaippallimalil John
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [6gip] 6G Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] 6G Lars Eggert
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? David Lake
- Re: [6gip] 6G Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] 6G Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] 6G Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? John Grant
- Re: [6gip] 6G Lars Eggert
- Re: [6gip] 6G Lars Eggert
- Re: [6gip] 6G John Grant
- Re: [6gip] 6G Stewart Bryant
- Re: [6gip] 6G David Lake
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? David Lake
- Re: [6gip] 6G Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] 6G Lars Eggert
- Re: [6gip] 6G Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] 6G Lars Eggert
- Re: [6gip] 6G Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [6gip] 6G Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? John Grant
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? - timeline Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Toerless Eckert
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Rex Buddenberg
- Re: [6gip] 6G Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? David Lake
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? David Lake
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Stewart Bryant
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? John Grant
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? David Lake
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? David Lake
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? David Lake
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [6gip] 6G in 3GPP? John Grant