Re: [6gip] xG evolution by years, and a forecast
John Grant <j@ninetiles.com> Fri, 31 December 2021 11:04 UTC
Return-Path: <j@ninetiles.com>
X-Original-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A133A133F for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 03:04:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.852, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cWf6EDArsMCI for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 03:04:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpq1.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq1.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.57.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BF723A133E for <6gip@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 03:04:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [212.54.57.110] (helo=csmtp6.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq1.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <j@ninetiles.com>) id 1n3Fhr-0005u6-Qy for 6gip@ietf.org; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 12:04:19 +0100
Received: from [192.168.0.167] ([82.2.126.150]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPA id 3Fhrn6cg024zo3FhrnUNLd; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 12:04:19 +0100
X-SourceIP: 82.2.126.150
X-Authenticated-Sender: john.s.grant@ntlworld.com
X-Spam: 0
X-Authority: v=2.4 cv=K8YxogaI c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=61cee3b3 cx=a_exe a=QXjYErKpTvCphas764AhgA==:117 a=QXjYErKpTvCphas764AhgA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=IOMw9HtfNCkA:10 a=le6d79QuAAAA:8 a=oCcaPWc0AAAA:8 a=VmnmZBlmho2iyvQ2ymsA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=QbAMNLWdp4a7deKPGBBn:22
Message-ID: <c937cfde-b6fe-8204-a05b-cfe067f65b07@ninetiles.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 11:04:18 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1
Content-Language: en-GB
To: 6gip@ietf.org
References: <ea10e064-df32-9a9a-b590-0be5a908d269@gmail.com> <15014_1640683978_61CAD9CA_15014_486_1_e536af4e4f3647878c89fe6a6cb31a0a@orange.com> <e4ac341e-0213-ad9c-fc8c-7d1e7217c7b0@gmail.com> <1640883365.3160.4.camel@gmail.com>
From: John Grant <j@ninetiles.com>
In-Reply-To: <1640883365.3160.4.camel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 211231-0, 12/31/2021), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfNv6Us6bQTjjHx9iunBSxSwn0ZXJZurwU0EI+EmhTfFQOIpFqFyC83n15P/UYXXrSKZAADW+RGe2f5JVv4sNULvpU97hf5iiU+rorl1KFGzonixlCAIa r8RNcXM44t9yc6lw3XZduhQtQSSPdXkutHj687wWHJrr2d/FsP+0xOwlfnFu1hT99iEYwkQOZlj9iA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6gip/CQ0IEY5Zz89rbbC2KxnYTilkjJ8>
Subject: Re: [6gip] xG evolution by years, and a forecast
X-BeenThere: 6gip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Issues in 6th Generation Mobile Network System \(6gip\)" <6gip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6gip/>
List-Post: <mailto:6gip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 11:04:29 -0000
On 30/12/2021 16:56, Rex Buddenberg wrote: > LTE, by contrast, is a routable network segment. Packet switch. It's > plugged into the internet, not the PSTN. This is a one-time big deal > change Effectively from a system for having conversations (where latency is an issue) to one for messaging and accessing data (where it isn't, or anyway not to the same extent). Following the change in user behaviour that began when text messaging was introduced, and became unexpectedly popular. Now 6G is proposing to support the latency-sensitive applications that were promised for 5G but didn't happen. -- John Grant Nine Tiles, Cambridge, England +44 1223 862599 and +44 1223 511455 http://www.ninetiles.com -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
- [6gip] xG evolution by years, and a forecast Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] xG evolution by years, and a forecast lionel.morand
- Re: [6gip] xG evolution by years, and a forecast Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] xG evolution by years, and a forecast Rex Buddenberg
- Re: [6gip] xG evolution by years, and a forecast John Grant