Re: [6gip] Wi-Fi 6E

Simon Leinen <simon.leinen@switch.ch> Tue, 05 January 2021 09:47 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.leinen@switch.ch>
X-Original-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE133A0AC4 for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 01:47:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=switch.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n5TvyCcSuTeh for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 01:47:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.switch.ch (mx1.switch.ch [84.254.110.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E17CE3A0ADF for <6gip@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 01:47:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at switch.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=switch.ch; s=selector1; t=1609840061; bh=eeV3Cr452J+THoWDHuoZJ+EeV2XqoSdLeX2omFZp6Mw=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=i/uXUM5DBXQfLYFJJgvdgfyIN6wB/HiFzsCqJ53FaarESFIzAT2fM3liVV6a3Hu8v JJ+N6VnQU9jamAGfdsDWhK/ZdPPHPpyJj8wxlgl8EYLd9tdSvBCyDs3m+yX3fsNvvw FgLJir+PoFuSRj/Q5qheQ97UJCZR7dqvy1zcbHwfJZh4UQ35+Ys7qdmTKK/3rvnKKR sG6YbmUJQ5To0F6A0b+ra8Yld77CySNuqJ51BaAA8rvNDRPMAYJh1PMu50XivUMu1Q yRjvsQWgiIzKSwLK7k1+EBc1Iz5IeePTEFkgVhtxZ2a2xvFKT4b7bBZa9brmBo5iCQ C+5pTcwUQY97Q==
Authentication-Results: mx1.switch.ch; x-trusted-ip=pass
From: Simon Leinen <simon.leinen@switch.ch>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
CC: <6gip@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <98ff2178-ac71-5eda-92ba-7d1767d37443@gmail.com> (Alexandre Petrescu's message of "Mon, 4 Jan 2021 22:34:35 +0100")
References: <CAC8QAcf1d0_zHA8H0nFky04zEm-JHC6EoVNg7udFH4=5jx7LmQ@mail.gmail.com> <98ff2178-ac71-5eda-92ba-7d1767d37443@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (darwin)
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:47:26 +0100
Message-ID: <m1pn2jn2a9.fsf@switch.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-ClientProxiedBy: SWH-S05-EXC3.swd.switch.ch (172.16.60.14) To SWH-S04-EXC2.swd.switch.ch (172.16.60.12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6gip/LnF_ggBVJbgNxa9_9Q_CsnpSOAY>
Subject: Re: [6gip] Wi-Fi 6E
X-BeenThere: 6gip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Issues in 6th Generation Mobile Network System \(6gip\)" <6gip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6gip/>
List-Post: <mailto:6gip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 09:47:57 -0000

Alexandre Petrescu writes:
> Le 04/01/2021 à 17:48, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit :
>> Hi all,
>> 6G came to Wi-Fi :) now it is time for smart phones.
>> It is weird why they call it 6E?

> I suspect '6' as using a band somewhere at 6GHz.  But I dont know
> which band more precisely would that be.  Is it the band typically
> used for 802.11-OCB which is 5.875MHz-5.925MHz?

> E in '6E' might mean 'Extended', or some band that is beyond that
> hypothetical 6GHz band.  But I dont know which one.  It could be
> towards 27GHz and why not somewhere at 70GHz.

No, it's slightly different:

"Wi-Fi 6" is the marketing name for IEEE 802.11ax, i.e. the latest
currently available generation of Wifi technology.  No relation to 6G or
6GHz! (The spectral efficiency of Wi-Fi 6/802.11ax is similar to 5G NR,
thanks to high-level QAM and (MU-)MIMO.)  The generation-based "Wi-Fi N"
nomenclature is fairly new.  I think it was introduced with Wi-Fi 5
(IEEE 802.11ac) and was "backported" to earlier Wi-Fi generations.

Early last year, the FCC in the US made a large band of spectrum in the
6GHz band available for unlicensed use.  This is quite significant,
because the new frequency range is significantly larger than both old
Wifi bands (2.4/5GHz) combined(*)!

So people are now building products that support this new frequency
range.  The MAC will be the same as for IEEE 802.11ax/Wifi 6, and the
Wi-Fi Alliance decided to call this new standard "Wi-Fi 6E".

> But I think these bands will continue to stay separated from the bands
> planned for the 6G '6th Generation', which might be in the Terahertz
> range.

> I terms of timeline: WiFi 6E might be on the consumer market maybe in
> a year or two whereas with 6G we look at first trials in 8 years time.

Right, actually I think we will see Wi-Fi 6E products quite a bit before
the end of the current year.

Cheers,
-- 
Simon.

* In the US, this new "6GHz" band is actually the range from 5.925 GHz
  to 7.125 GHz.  Let's see what happens in other regions - for Europe,
  it looks like the band will be smaller (5.945-6.425 GHz?), which is a
  pity because people live more densely in Europe than in the US, so a
  larger band would be quite useful to avoid collisions between
  neighbors.  Oh well.