Re: [6gip] Wi-Fi 6E

Simon Leinen <simon.leinen@switch.ch> Thu, 07 January 2021 10:22 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.leinen@switch.ch>
X-Original-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9EC3A0E8A for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 02:22:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=switch.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7kMGmjapQWVQ for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 02:22:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.switch.ch (mx2.switch.ch [84.254.110.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C3203A0E88 for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 02:22:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at switch.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=switch.ch; s=selector1; t=1610014959; bh=1YZV34LoC0lRSOf80CT8RkrHurIcIigJiABufPTQI/U=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=lIjthafJcuFvTGAixFH7OPBlwfzwJnMqFeWDfdMOn3e8OLRMEkqCcLrIBSdxoYUvk joCrcYW3zYDUQfGxP82WL+dPJS/TyM4vf9JI/IP1MDNj/3mhIZeTy2Sme/J2T2WFQn cm9qodGwBc6YQ1sYoYQqsh2Pxkh9B9drrcrFyxGdgGQdI0wlA5er1rkyIfwNBexezR S7dnGCAagcz2hWS/66M3f7h9fnZ9I1/MXda4xaN5NWL57NDv4Uqjj3O1udj2FdcBG4 1hkAcKRQD9vyFc9Abi/XkFHOUqlV82wW3j90KofmPhiwywl8onV6cJr2D5WrKkwqm1 0gSxm6es6Qk3Q==
Authentication-Results: mx2.switch.ch; x-trusted-ip=pass
Received: from SWH-S04-EXC2.swd.switch.ch (unknown [172.16.60.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.switch.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7790676E115; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:22:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from macsl (172.16.60.30) by SWH-S04-EXC2.swd.switch.ch (172.16.60.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.3; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:22:26 +0100
From: Simon Leinen <simon.leinen@switch.ch>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
CC: <sarikaya@ieee.org>, <6gip@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <cd778ab0-2eb6-3a19-5e95-19492966e559@gmail.com> (Alexandre Petrescu's message of "Thu, 7 Jan 2021 10:29:26 +0100")
References: <CAC8QAcf1d0_zHA8H0nFky04zEm-JHC6EoVNg7udFH4=5jx7LmQ@mail.gmail.com> <98ff2178-ac71-5eda-92ba-7d1767d37443@gmail.com> <m1pn2jn2a9.fsf@switch.ch> <CAC8QAcdb1J3gdD5oEUGcXCcZRMa6ZpHoR4i=B1EVNXS1wzLDqg@mail.gmail.com> <0ec51f75-9e9f-6565-bcfb-04d7b4658966@gmail.com> <m1r1mykv11.fsf@switch.ch> <cd778ab0-2eb6-3a19-5e95-19492966e559@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (darwin)
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:22:26 +0100
Message-ID: <m1ble1dp25.fsf@switch.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-ClientProxiedBy: SWH-S05-EXC3.swd.switch.ch (172.16.60.14) To SWH-S04-EXC2.swd.switch.ch (172.16.60.12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6gip/N-4sgqq6HGb9z80W9E7kLicL6ME>
Subject: Re: [6gip] Wi-Fi 6E
X-BeenThere: 6gip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Issues in 6th Generation Mobile Network System \(6gip\)" <6gip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6gip/>
List-Post: <mailto:6gip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 10:22:46 -0000

Alexandre Petrescu writes:
>> In the US (since July 2020 I think):
>> 5.925 GHz to 7.125 GHz
>> In the EU (should be ratified this month(?) and passed into member
>> state law over the subsequent six months):
>> 5.925 GHz to 6.425 GHz

> 5.925MHz?

> Wouldn't that would overstep the ITS spectrum which was recently
> extended up to 5.935MHz as per
>> Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1426 of 7 October 2020 on
>> the harmonised use of radio spectrum in the 5 875-5 935 MHz
>> frequency band for safety-related applications of intelligent
>> transport systems (ITS) and repealing Decision 2008/671/EC (notified
>> under document C(2020) 6773) (Text with EEA relevance)

> https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1602230223168&uri=CELEX:32020D1426

Interesting, I was unaware of this ITS assignment.

The diagrams in Chuck Lukaszewski's presentation show that both the US
and the EU versions of the Wi-Fi 6E ranges start with 20MHz of "guard
band", so this assignemnt should be safe; and the frequencies actually
usable for Wi-Fi 6E communications only start at 5.945 GHz.  Sorry for
the confusion.
-- 
Simon.

> ITS spectrum is for a WiFi used in OCB mode which stands for Outside the
> Context of a BSSID; this means, for example, in that WiFi there is no
> Association Req or Resp messages.  It was typically done in the
> 5.875-5.925MHz range, but now up to 5.935MHz.

> Of maybe WiFi 6E wants to cover ITS as well.

> Alex


>> ...so, at least initially, only half the amount of spectrum (the
>> "lower half").  Maybe more later, who knows.
>> Sorry for the US/EU-centricism.  I'm not quite sure what's happening
>> in other countries, except that the Ofcom in the UK already stated
>> their support for Wi-Fi 6E, also in the "lower half" range.  "Ask
>> your local regulator", or look for information on the Internet.
>> There's an excellent video explaining Wi-Fi 6E here, including
>> spectrum regulation status, again in particular in the US and
>> (EU/CEPT) Europe, and some technical differences between Wi-Fi 6 and
>> 6E beyond the additional spectrum:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fHrKaEB_fk
>> (Kudos to Anders Nilsson from SUNET for pointing me to it.)
>>