Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G
Frank Fitzek <frank.fitzek@tu-dresden.de> Thu, 07 January 2021 19:14 UTC
Return-Path: <frank.fitzek@tu-dresden.de>
X-Original-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F433A0B10
for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:14:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.147
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001,
T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id J1sd8-Hxabis for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:14:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout5.zih.tu-dresden.de (mailout5.zih.tu-dresden.de
[141.30.67.74])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 475E53A0AF3
for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:14:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.26.34.108] (helo=msx.tu-dresden.de)
by mailout5.zih.tu-dresden.de with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <frank.fitzek@tu-dresden.de>)
id 1kxak4-0006YD-JH
for 6gip@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 20:14:40 +0100
Received: from [192.168.2.108] (87.142.67.149) by
msx-l108.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.34.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 20:14:40 +0100
To: <6gip@ietf.org>
References: <CAC8QAcehdY7ZMM528EurJ-H5WCbPM_YodBi3uE=MwZBnSUT2Yg@mail.gmail.com>
<FRAPR01MB1252B940C4B52CDE23AD42D6D1FC0@FRAPR01MB1252.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE>
<DB7PR06MB47926584901A75CEFB5973E7B5FC0@DB7PR06MB4792.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
<b301c27d-db9b-9ff8-3771-fc86c5f58dee@ninetiles.com>
<FRAPR01MB1252A810545FF74ADF7C4716D1F40@FRAPR01MB1252.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE>
<5c891c8d-62b6-c0af-5388-984d301fe408@gmail.com>
<099804f7-3704-c015-71bc-2b094ee3ea53@gmail.com>
<18919675-ea7c-ae93-1e53-7625340a081d@tu-dresden.de>
<03859cfc-2635-09ac-b66b-2556afcc7a91@gmail.com>
From: Frank Fitzek <frank.fitzek@tu-dresden.de>
Message-ID: <e8a8be95-1651-9fbd-6242-7c8bda8b29bb@tu-dresden.de>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 20:14:40 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <03859cfc-2635-09ac-b66b-2556afcc7a91@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------8E7A4DB6FE1F7A7DC814BF26"
Content-Language: en-US
X-ClientProxiedBy: MSX-L102.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.34.102) To
msx-l108.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.34.108)
X-PMWin-Version: 4.0.4, Antivirus-Engine: 3.79.0, Antivirus-Data: 5.80
X-TUD-Virus-Scanned: mailout5.zih.tu-dresden.de
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6gip/R5SSLFKHX-auSgJxan5cLj3K5vw>
Subject: Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G
X-BeenThere: 6gip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Issues in 6th Generation Mobile Network System \(6gip\)"
<6gip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6gip>,
<mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6gip/>
List-Post: <mailto:6gip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6gip>,
<mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 19:14:45 -0000
Sorry SA = Stand Alone (Real 5G networks) NSA = Non Stand Alone 5G air interface with 4G networks Most operators used NSA solution to get 5G to the mobile. So if the limitation is the EPC (or the connection to the EPC) , then it has nothing to do with 5G access. FF. On 07/01/2021 20:09, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: > > > Le 07/01/2021 à 20:05, Frank Fitzek a écrit : >> Happy New Year ! >> >> Are there already 5G SA networks? Or better on which networks did the >> author test the data rate? SA and NSA makes a huge difference. > > SA? Security Association? > NSA? National Security Agency? > > I will gladly consider the SA/NSA distinction with the SFR and Free > deployments I know here where I live. > > But I dont know what it means. > > Alex > >> FF >> >> >> >> On 07/01/2021 19:02, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: >>> >>> I recently read an article in the New York Times where the writer >>> tested a few 5G smartphones on some cellular networks and some >>> places in USA. >>> >>> He said that 5G bandwidth looked higher than 4G+ to him in some >>> places but he felt that better in open areas rather than indoors. >>> It was not significantly higher, just a little bit higher. >>> >>> I think what 5G needs is these intelligent reflecting surfaces which >>> might help increase coverage in a more energy-efficient manner, >>> maybe less risky for health, and avoid somehow in some cases >>> societal opposition. >>> >>> We cant dream about hundred Gbit/s bandwidths for IP on 6G if the >>> increase from 4G to 5G bandwidths is not at leastten times more. >>> >>> If 4G is 50Mbit/s and 5G is 100Mbit/s then we cant expect 6G to be >>> 100GBit/s. >>> >>> Le 03/12/2020 à 12:32, Alexandre Petrescu a écrit : >>>> 3. use of meta surfaces (aka Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces). >>>> This is >>>> a feature newly proposed in 6G that was never mentioned in earlier >>>> generations, but it is a natural tool in the bag of the radio inclined >>>> designer. If range is not enough then put a reflecing surface >>>> there to >>>> extend the range. New in 6G is that these surfaces seem to be more >>>> intelligent at PHY layer - it's not just a piece of concrete (like a >>>> mirror) but some nano electronics are put on it to reflect in a more >>>> intelligent way. >>> >> >> -- >> >> Frank H.P. Fitzek >> Professor >> Deutsche Telekom Chair of Communication Networks >> Institute of Communication Technology >> Technische Universität Dresden >> >> mobile: +49 151 160 00003 >> phone: +49 351 463 33945 >> fax: +49 351 463 37163 >> >> web: cn.ifn.et.tu-dresden.de >> >> >> >> 5G Lab Germany - Coordinator - 5Glab.de >> CeTI - Speaker - ceti.tu-dresden.de >> Smart System Hub - Speaker - smart-systems-hub.de >> >> > -- Frank H.P. Fitzek Professor Deutsche Telekom Chair of Communication Networks Institute of Communication Technology Technische Universität Dresden mobile: +49 151 160 00003 phone: +49 351 463 33945 fax: +49 351 463 37163 web: cn.ifn.et.tu-dresden.de 5G Lab Germany - Coordinator - 5Glab.de CeTI - Speaker - ceti.tu-dresden.de Smart System Hub - Speaker - smart-systems-hub.de
- [6gip] Slides from IETF 109 Side Meeting Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [6gip] Slides from IETF 109 Side Meeting Dirk.von-Hugo
- Re: [6gip] Slides from IETF 109 Side Meeting David Lake
- Re: [6gip] Slides from IETF 109 Side Meeting John Grant
- [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G Dirk.von-Hugo
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G Frank Fitzek
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G Frank Fitzek
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G David Lake
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G John Grant
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G Rex Buddenberg