IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6gip] 6G

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 14 January 2021 11:22 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE4A3A12CC for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 03:22:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.406
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.406 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SEAhq_mIafp1 for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 03:22:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0568A3A12CA for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 03:22:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 10EBMgCO011637; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:22:42 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 969D3206169; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:22:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842C1206130; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:22:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.14.10.2] ([10.14.10.2]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 10EBMgUC024728; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:22:42 +0100
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Cc: Kaippallimalil John <john.kaippallimalil@futurewei.com>, "Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" <hannu.flinck@nokia-bell-labs.com>, "6gip@ietf.org" <6gip@ietf.org>
References: <HE1PR07MB3386A43B4B32BF2CE5DC48C79BAA0@HE1PR07MB3386.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <248399ab-7dc1-ee13-928c-751568ea58e5@gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB3386A19851BFFF1ED5DDECAE9BA90@HE1PR07MB3386.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <SA0PR13MB40801CE55D18D1EF814ED7CDE8A99@SA0PR13MB4080.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <86fad3c0-a5b0-f6a5-4671-1802d724c5a5@gmail.com> <43004FC4-43C2-4B52-99C8-33A9360DEA30@eggert.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <40993238-97e2-1c5b-fcd9-824b58be5e94@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:22:42 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <43004FC4-43C2-4B52-99C8-33A9360DEA30@eggert.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6gip/RrqV7aAaJl0FdeXGalKhh3HsudY>
Subject: Re: [6gip] 6G
X-BeenThere: 6gip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Issues in 6th Generation Mobile Network System \(6gip\)" <6gip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6gip/>
List-Post: <mailto:6gip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:22:52 -0000


Le 14/01/2021 à 09:52, Lars Eggert a écrit :
[...]

> Unless you claim that "6G" will be a radio LAN, I don't think these 
> assumptions are sensible.

I think 6G will stay separated from WiFi for a long time.  The spectrum
is separated in a fundamental way between 'licensed' and 'unlicensed';
the regulation at regulatory bodies, the fines to pay, the licenses to
pay are huge differences.

Even if 3G and 4G claimed to do some work on WiFi (there are many 3GPP
documents that claim to act on WiFi), these are still just allegations,
an dmaybe less about deployments.  5G might continue on these
allegations but the deployments will again be different.

6G might have a positive interest of not embarking on the WiFi paths,
and let it to the WiFi SDOs.

Alex

> 
> Lars
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email