IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6gip] 6G

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Thu, 14 January 2021 12:07 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A943A1444 for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 04:07:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T0ikG7eVULbq for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 04:07:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2E553A13DE for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 04:07:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:429:77c6:2f03:640b] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:429:77c6:2f03:640b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 406F460007B; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:07:18 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1610626038; bh=9B4mL/6YczOYGq8QTL5tCI+D1w7ihN+qAkclvNmM9II=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=Nt+7S21XoOonjCs97mLZJA8xn8woeidZaGb6RgkUdyr4U+diTsDuuggsH6xK/JUZQ AjupCHp/hdKmbID3Lp3GvpqcInnt/J9NCX3ghCcs48FW+Xi+OYV6lwhUBOjjH7Ef7i 4bB2wvpT1GMaV/85E9qJSR/wtvgi3o3XMxUdNXAU=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <844E2FF4-7D79-45FE-95DD-86AEBB44C180@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D58CAB9E-1302-430F-9ACD-C5E62FFCB50A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.40.0.2.32\))
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:07:14 +0200
In-Reply-To: <40993238-97e2-1c5b-fcd9-824b58be5e94@gmail.com>
Cc: "Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" <hannu.flinck@nokia-bell-labs.com>, "6gip@ietf.org" <6gip@ietf.org>, Kaippallimalil John <john.kaippallimalil@futurewei.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
References: <HE1PR07MB3386A43B4B32BF2CE5DC48C79BAA0@HE1PR07MB3386.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <248399ab-7dc1-ee13-928c-751568ea58e5@gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB3386A19851BFFF1ED5DDECAE9BA90@HE1PR07MB3386.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <SA0PR13MB40801CE55D18D1EF814ED7CDE8A99@SA0PR13MB4080.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <86fad3c0-a5b0-f6a5-4671-1802d724c5a5@gmail.com> <43004FC4-43C2-4B52-99C8-33A9360DEA30@eggert.org> <40993238-97e2-1c5b-fcd9-824b58be5e94@gmail.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 406F460007B.A00C1
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6gip/UK3FhflKbUG0HyDz90fwnSXHYN4>
Subject: Re: [6gip] 6G
X-BeenThere: 6gip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Issues in 6th Generation Mobile Network System \(6gip\)" <6gip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6gip/>
List-Post: <mailto:6gip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:07:29 -0000

On 2021-1-14, at 13:22, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 14/01/2021 à 09:52, Lars Eggert a écrit :
> [...]
>> Unless you claim that "6G" will be a radio LAN, I don't think these assumptions are sensible.
> 
> I think 6G will stay separated from WiFi for a long time.

That's not the point I'm trying to make. This is not about WiFi vs "6G".

The point I'm trying to make is that the "1 us" requirement you posed implicitly means you are talking about a LAN (as in local area network), due to speed-of-light limits.

Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email