[6gip] Internet addressing: Problem statement and Gap analysis
Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Mon, 19 July 2021 14:43 UTC
Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65A73A3603 for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 07:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kxO8aimdSSDQ for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 07:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A1213A3612 for <6gip@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 07:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id u1so22401834wrs.1 for <6gip@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 07:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=sMsQxFxj/m3XROgialpA7SUDE0ItVNIzkosEE67PRg0=; b=DB9HQ7iM9oQPjmvdpnlUzP4UGB1cQZUlPzGxIi4uDyv6OYIg1oTY4d5+ChLTUfZm/L udnsmReBVV1miu0Lu6QXOjaf43ZMiHRi5SyjxEuglieo6EVhOqFQ6UkSkH1C9xKl2q2D VQ2BCQy6ITvZ8aIDxD8GBKhyqPceS6uPSdGXzcFDijr53xBFSMld32JByJrhCgFdKjrJ iuCauKywiUsPzMpp1mV+YgiSV6H4wLt2pz2hk3VeUvgpQq8d4vmkHB4W4+ApOZvfcWXU bmBFz7ra5b9WD2nP3kdEh9eL8hlTb3m8+ED1Z3czF2ZxzYKfynPv7FFiBl821vRcZ0NJ ngmQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=sMsQxFxj/m3XROgialpA7SUDE0ItVNIzkosEE67PRg0=; b=L+AAO3bAnDlOha93woq6zMeq1wxX7NUBZwdpfY4oXLFQBfQybYdVFhmOv+r5ESaLwm Ja0uRFXkd4y0G7E36Fohh8v+wyjMJltfF/w8awiGdTDqMBgHQ9CPv3WIc9wxjHMUJYPr hy73cnRrkvk3KbvfmRxXAepZ4J3OmA5n0fMPi/U24amHMmbVrUMR9g/5wqlIebWlqdoR mMJFyFBMiH4HnraNgQiZpler9SQ1vbH1/TEEkEZPsD2x2dGXxzNFdfzTEkGRxZMKyfpG mFaRUoBmmDowwVpl6vBuYry5jqst+SOImwdOu/u6ptnJb4F2rIHzRcFFj2r4lUSi8Qc8 IjYQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53232xztyw+3bz4I2NTjY0ycOBgCM7SHqaAHFeylxNnevJT1Itzs 3IeBe2GsI9zxF3aq6fDuRZ7kVJ+2MDD8Tt+c
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwpkHi+EBzFStJt23RoEY/XJdxIZRp9OOw5J+YtrCMZncpk9poG+52FSNf8av0tDhQzMDb2sg==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:67d0:: with SMTP id n16mr5205383wrw.266.1626705764992; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 07:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2a01:e0a:1ec:470:bcbf:732c:a0:7bb8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v11sm20112438wrs.4.2021.07.19.07.42.44 for <6gip@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 07:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_682CCA42-4AE0-4B90-8B27-FF0CC91B6B23"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
Message-Id: <499D555F-2EC0-4C29-B778-96D41A5FCDFD@gigix.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:42:44 +0200
To: 6gip@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6gip/V3vKC5KGXvD61Tp786RJVDI8aw4>
Subject: [6gip] Internet addressing: Problem statement and Gap analysis
X-BeenThere: 6gip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Issues in 6th Generation Mobile Network System \(6gip\)" <6gip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6gip/>
List-Post: <mailto:6gip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:43:11 -0000
Dear all, We have submitted two companion I-Ds on issues regarding Internet addressing, continuing the discussion on Internet addressing started at IETF110. The first draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jia-intarea-scenarios-problems-addressing/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jia-intarea-scenarios-problems-addressing/>) provides an update on various communication scenarios and issues identified in those scenarios regarding addressing. Those issues lead ultimately to outlining a problem statement for a discussion to re-think the approach to extensions to Internet addressing. The second draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jia-intarea-internet-addressing-gap-analysis/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jia-intarea-internet-addressing-gap-analysis/>) builds on this problem statement by providing an analysis of extensions to identified key properties of Internet addressing. Those extensions are presented along various methodologies for realizing them and examples that have done so, while their existence is being seen as evidence for the existence of gaps to the original Internet addressing albeit filling those gaps through a plethora of point extensions rather than a coherent architectural approach. It is this point extension approach that has led to a number of issues, such as complexity, fragility, among others, that the draft outlines. We believe that the intended goal of re-thinking Internet addressing may be of interest to this community and we would therefore invite you to not only review those drafts but provide your comments and feedback - please do so on the current 'home' for this discussion, the int-area mailing list of the IETF. Best regards, Luigi (on behalf of all authors)
- [6gip] Internet addressing: Problem statement and… Luigi Iannone