IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6gip] Side Meeting Closing Notes

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Thu, 11 March 2021 12:26 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 206FC3A1ACC for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 04:26:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MaqaQNXP_0EA for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 04:26:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D415F3A1ACA for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 04:26:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:29b9:a500:a909:88e0] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:29b9:a500:a909:88e0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A7317600314; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:26:38 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1615465598; bh=Vzx0ps3gv+3h7Njd2/4GLpoMlwXMfdzQajGovBPFQD0=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=g62CDgqYLgQp6ON16eJeu/UL7CTGiPvxE1stKnu5cvh8B06OARiSAixlFpq5sCRcN ssmP42g+bGbk9amZyA68S8UA9BjzXJabZmLuCOKs38eOI4AWzFZG+NNoWt/0oZjkQp NBF0iISw27gs7cLK1mAVQHQyo69Ef7y0oj/LkvE8=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <4E1E9FFD-67FE-4695-98B6-DAC17634D345@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3B0FC7D1-7F67-4E50-8C98-A19B829AC419"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:26:38 +0200
In-Reply-To: <D6BB27AC-E5EA-4325-AC38-787DD5208831@gigix.net>
Cc: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, 6gip@ietf.org
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
References: <CAC8QAcdxyPPNuCWRXFfh_cK6f71MLR-swj=R_RxtUu7Ge30jTw@mail.gmail.com> <DB7PR06MB479295BFD19D532A9EDD74B5B5929@DB7PR06MB4792.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <20210310122832.GJ57127@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <BEXP281MB0165E06BA8B896F205097601D1919@BEXP281MB0165.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20210310150249.GT57127@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <MN2PR03MB52317F92515550346763D3D6D1919@MN2PR03MB5231.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <61c4d82d-0ab1-234d-2a80-d380479d03a9@gmail.com> <320B448C-5277-49E8-A8E4-E4CF3DB750E5@gigix.net> <1E72E021-F925-45AD-A1D9-32A4D0A2B9A9@eggert.org> <D6BB27AC-E5EA-4325-AC38-787DD5208831@gigix.net>
X-MailScanner-ID: A7317600314.A100A
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6gip/nFsttfgY4kV21iwOL_5Byx6Ig4A>
Subject: Re: [6gip] Side Meeting Closing Notes
X-BeenThere: 6gip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Issues in 6th Generation Mobile Network System \(6gip\)" <6gip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6gip/>
List-Post: <mailto:6gip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:26:49 -0000

Hi,

On 2021-3-11, at 14:23, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> I am not a lawyer, and may be I am mistaken… or may be GDPR does not apply? Don’t know.

I'm not a lawyer either, but my take would be that *if* the Note Well is shown and people are informed that they need to comply or leave the meeting, not leaving the meeting counts as an active affirmative act?

Thanks,
Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email