Re: [6gip] Side Meeting Closing Notes

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 11 March 2021 09:09 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87AA63A168A for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 01:09:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k6V-A7hjjudG for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 01:09:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0D063A1688 for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 01:09:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 12B99eQY004985 for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 10:09:40 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id C0EF1200C2C for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 10:09:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C452007F1 for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 10:09:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 12B99e7m001694 for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 10:09:40 +0100
To: 6gip@ietf.org
References: <CAC8QAcdxyPPNuCWRXFfh_cK6f71MLR-swj=R_RxtUu7Ge30jTw@mail.gmail.com> <DB7PR06MB479295BFD19D532A9EDD74B5B5929@DB7PR06MB4792.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <3B9C4872-F5A5-4242-8BD5-5198913C3ABD@eggert.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ba64d5a0-fa28-3e73-2a0a-dad8637a0c58@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 10:09:40 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3B9C4872-F5A5-4242-8BD5-5198913C3ABD@eggert.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6gip/qHk-mVbljQl4UdiV29t4pRy1R90>
Subject: Re: [6gip] Side Meeting Closing Notes
X-BeenThere: 6gip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Issues in 6th Generation Mobile Network System \(6gip\)" <6gip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6gip/>
List-Post: <mailto:6gip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:09:45 -0000


Le 11/03/2021 à 09:50, Lars Eggert a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> On 2021-3-10, at 1:46, David Lake <d.lake@surrey.ac.uk> wrote:
>> We cannot continue like this.  I’m afraid for me the tone of the 
>> conversation and the quality of the chairmanship was simply not 
>> acceptable.
> 
> I would like so strongly second this. In another email on this 
> thread, I already pointed to the IETF Note Well 
> (https://www.ietf.org/about/note-well/) and explained that it
> applies to side meetings. It (also) says:
> 
> • As a participant or attendee, you agree to work respectfully with 
> other participants (...)

Inherently, I think that what appeared as disrespect was not really
disrespect.

I think that the person was on a very hurry to push eveyrone to focus on
the discussion slide (the 6G topics) rather than diverging on other
topics.  I think this is normal in early topic meetings to try to make
progress.

Also, it is true, that there was an apparent non-listening, or non
understanding, from the organizer.  But that has multiple causes which
are not his fault:
- the time was very short and the organizer had to react quickly.
- the way in which webex works (only one video displayed, lack of
   queueing and a mike attribution strategy), made participants think (I
   suspect) that they should reply to the organizer, whereas the
   organizer assumed that there should be discussion between
   participants, not between participants and organizer.

Also, it is true, that the end result of this appeared to be very bad to
contributors.  That situation is really not desirable.

> Several of us pointed out during the meeting that the way in which a 
> convener of the side meeting repeatedly talked over Marie-Jose 
> Montpetit when she tried to make a contribution was simply 
> unacceptable, even more so because male participants were not 
> subjected to the same behavior.

But, that amounts to sexism.  If that is the same feeling from several
people, then I think it should be addressed and not let go, action taken.

Alex

> 
> If I see other instances of such disrespectful behavior, I will work 
> towards getting this mailing list closed, and will discourage IETF 
> participants from attending any future side meetings.
> 
> Lars Eggert IETF Chair
> 
>